Week 5 Reading Research Literature

01 Jun Week 5 Reading Research Literature

Question

<pclass=”msonormal” style=”box-sizing: border-box;”>Week 5 Reading Research Literature

Reading Research Literature

Guidelines and Grading Rubric– Week5

The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.

COURSE OUTCOMES

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and8)

CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and8)

POINTS:This assignment is worth 225 points.

DUE DATE:Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sundayat the end of Week 5.

REQUIREMENTS

1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.

Retrieve the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.

Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., &amp; Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. 203132. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. Retrieved from http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., &Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1. Retrieved from http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live

2. Download the NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_form.
3. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0.
4. Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your formdoes NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.
5. Save the fileby clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.
6. Submit to the Week 5 Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5Q&A Forum.

GRADING CRITERIA

Category Points % Description

Velayutham, et al article: Question 1 10 4% Identifies the purpose of the research article.

Question 2 10 4% Identifies the research question implied in the study.

Question 3 10 4% Describes the research design of the study.

Question 4 10 4% Identifies and describes the population.

Question 5 10 4% Was the sample approach adequate for the research design

Question 6 10 4% Describe the data collection procedure

Question 7 10 4% How were the data analyzed

Question 8 10 4% Describes the limitations in the study.

Question 9 10 4% Describes the authors’ conclusions.

Question 10 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field.

Pals et al article: Question 11 10 5% Identifies the purpose of the research article.

Question 12 10 5% Identifies the research question implied in the study.

Question 13 10 5% Describes the research design of the study.

Question 14 10 5% Identifies and describes the population.

Question 15 10 5% Was the sample approach adequate for the research design

Question 16 10 5% Describe the data collection procedure

Question 17 10 5% How were the data analyzed

Question 18 10 5% Describes the limitations in the study.

Question 19 10 5% Describes the authors’ conclusions.

Question 20 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field.

Style and Writing 25 11% Names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.

Total 225 pts 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements

Reading Research Literature – Week 5

Type your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_Smith.Submit by 11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be found on the assignment page.

Title: RRL

Name:[replace this text with your name]

The following questions pertain to:

Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site

1) What is the purpose of this research?

2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

3) Give a complete description of theresearch design of this study.

4) What is the population (sample) for this study.

5) Was the sampleapproach adequate for the research design that was selected and explain why

6) Describe the data collection procedure.

7) How were the data analyzed after collection?

8) Discuss the limitations found in the study.

9) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?

10) How does this advance knowledge in the field

The following questions pertain to:

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: a qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live

11) What is the purpose of this research?

12) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

13) Give a complete description of the research design of this study.

14) What is the population (sample) for this study?

15) Was the sample spproach adequate for the research design that was selected and explain why.

16) Describe the data collection procedure.

17) How were the data analyzed?

18) Discuss the limitations found in the study?

19) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?

20) How does this advance knowledge in the field.

</pclass=”msonormal”>