PICOT and Evidence Appraisal Worksheet – Week 3

Part 1: PICOT Question

Name:

Date:

Your Instructor’s Name:

Purpose: To identify a problem or concern that nursing can change and develop a PICOT question to guide the change project.

Directions:Use the form below to complete the Week 3 Assignment PICOT Evidence Worksheet. This includes filling in the table with information about your research question and your PICOT elements and the second part is filling in the Evidence Worksheet.

Step 1: Select the key PICO terms for searching the evidence. Clearly define your PICOT question. List each element P (problem, population, or problem), I (intervention), C (Comparison with other treatment/current practice), and O (Desired outcome), T (Time Frame). Is the potential solution something for which you (as nurse or student) can find a solution through evidence research? Look in your book for guidelines to developing your PICOT question and also read the required articles.

Step 2: Identify the problem.What have you noticed in your work or school environment that isn’t achieving the desired patient or learning outcomes? What needs to change in nursing, what can you change with the support of evidence in the literature? Describe the problem or practice issue that you want to research. What is your practice area; clinical, education, or administration? (This is NOT where you will list your PICOT question)

Step 3: How was the practice issues identified?How did you come to know this was a problem in your clinical practice? Review the listed concerns and check all that apply.

Step 4: What evidence must be gathered? Everyone should have a literature search. However, what other sources of reliable information will be helpful for your particular question?

Step 5: What terms will you use in order to make sure that your search is wide enough to obtain required information but narrow enough to keep it focused? What databases will you search? How will you narrow your search if needed?

PICOT Question
What is the PICOT question? Define each element of the question below: P– (Patient, population, or problem): I– (Intervention): C– (Comparison with other treatment/current practice): O– (Desired outcome): T-(Time Frame):
What is the practice issue/problem?
What is the practice area? ___ Clinical ___ Education	___ Administration ___ Other
How was the practice issue identified?(check all that apply) ___ Safety/risk management concerns ___ Unsatisfactory patient outcomes ___ Wide variations in practice ___ Significant financial concerns	___ Difference between hospital and community practice ___ Clinical practice issue is a concern ___ Procedure or process is a time waster ___ Clinical practice issue has no scientific base ___ Other:
What evidence must be gathered?(check all that apply)
___ Literature search ___ Guidelines ___ Expert Opinion ___ Patient Preferences	___ Clinical Expertise ___ Financial Analysis ___ Standards (Regulatory, professional, community) ___ Other
Search terms:
Databases to search:
Search Strategies:

Part 2: Evidence Appraisal

Name:

Date:

Your Instructor’s Name:

Purpose: To find evidence to support an intervention that will change the outcomes.

Directions: Type your search question below. Find FOUR sources to support the need for change and the potential intervention you have selected to solve the problem. All of your sources must be peer-reviewed articles, written within the last 5 years and from the CCN Library. Using the table below, insert and describe your four chosen resources.

Step 1: APA Reference for the article. You will need to list the reference for the source in APA format. Be careful when using built-in APA formats and library citations. They may not be in APA format. Refer to Chapter 7 of your APA manual and the resources in Course Resources.

Step 2: Type of Source. If your source is a research article, you will need to ensure that it is a peer review article, written within 5 years and from the CCN Library.

Step 3: Level of Evidence. Refer to page 23 in your text for levels of evidence.

Step 4: Brief Description of the Research. In this section, you will summarize the source in your own words. How does this information apply to your project? What are the results of the source? What are their recommendations? What was the sample?

Evidence Appraisal

	APA Reference for Article	Type of Source and Purpose of Research	Level of Evidence	Describe Sample	Brief Description of Research
Study 1
Study 2
Study 3
Study 4

Reading Research Literature

Guidelines and Grading Rubric– Week5

Purpose

The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and8)

CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and8)

Points:This assignment isworth 225 points.

Due Date:Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sundayat the end of Week 5.

Requirements

1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.

Retrieve the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.

Fu, M., Hu, J., & Cai, X. (2015). Effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management intervention for Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A pilot study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21,132-140. doi:10.1111/ijn.12373

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000356970800017&site=eds-live&scope=site

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live

2. Download the NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_form.

3. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment athttp://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0.

4. Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your formdoes NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.

5. Save the fileby clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.

6. Submit to the Week 5 Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5Q&A Forum.

Grading Criteria

Category	Points	%	Description
Fu, Hu, & Cai article: Question 1	10	4%	Identifies the purpose of the research article.
Question 2	10	4%	Identifies the research question implied in the study.
Question 3	10	4%	Describes the research design of the study.
Question 4	10	4%	Identifies and describes the population.
Question 5	10	4%	Was the sample adequate for the research design
Question 6	10	4%	Describe the data collection procedure
Question 7	10	4%	How were the data analyzed
Question 8	10	4%	Describes the limitations in the study.
Question 9	10	4%	Describes the authors’ conclusions.
Question 10	10	5%	How does this advance knowledge in the field.
Pals et al article: Question 11	10	5%	Identifies the purpose of the research article.
Question 12	10	5%	Identifies the research question implied in the study.
Question 13	10	5%	Describes the research design of the study.
Question 14	10	5%	Identifies and describes the population.
Question 15	10	5%	Was the sample adequate for the research design
Question 16	10	5%	Describe the data collection procedure
Question 17	10	5%	How were the data analyzed
Question 18	10	5%	Describes the limitations in the study.
Question 19	10	5%	Describes the authors’ conclusions.
Question 20	10	5%	How does this advance knowledge in the field.
Style and Writing	25	11%	Names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.
Total	225 pts	100%	A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria	A (100%) Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance	B (88%) Exceeds Very good or high level of performance	C (80%) Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance	NI (38%) Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance	F (0%) Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance
Fu, Hu, & Cai article: Question 1 Purpose 10 points	Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article. 10 points ?	Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article 9 points ?	Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article. 8 points ?	Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it. 4 points ?	Does not identify any purpose for the research. 0 points ?
Question 2 Research question 10 points	Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given. 10 points ?	Mostly identifies the research question that the author described. 9 points ?	Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described. 8 points ?	Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it. 4 points ?	Does not identify any research question. 0 points ?
Question 3 Research design 10 points	Correctly describes the research design of the study. 10 points ?	Mostly describes the research design of the study. 9 points ?	Somewhat describes the research design of the study. 8 points ?	Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it. 4 points ?	Does not identify any research design. 0 points ?
Question 4 Population 10 points	Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 10 points ?	Mostly describesidentifies and describes the population of the research article. 9 points ?	Somewhatidentifies and describes the population of the research article. 8 points ?	Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article. 4 points ?	Does notidentify any population. 0 points ?
Question 5 Sample 10 points	Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate. 10 points ?	Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate. 9 points ?	Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate. 8 points ?	Misidentifies the sampling approach. 4 points ?	Doesn’t explain any sampling approach. 0 points ?
Question 6 Data collection 10 points	Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail. 10 points ?	Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general. 9 points ?	Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it. 8 points ?	Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information. 4 points ?	Does not describe any data collection procedures. 0 points ?
Question 7 Data analysis 10 points	Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed. 10 points ?	Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed. 9 points ?	Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation. 8 points ?	Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information. 4 points ?	Does not describe how data were analyzed. 0 points ?
Question 8 Limitations 10 points	Correctlydescribes all of the limitations in the study. 10 points ?	Correctlydescribes most of the limitations in the study. 9 points ?	Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two. 8 points ?	Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them. 4 points ?	Does not describe any limitations for the study. 0 points ?
Question 9 Conclusions 10 points	Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions. 10 points ?	Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions. 9 points ?	Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two. 8 points ?	Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them. 4 points ?	Does not describe any author conclusions. 0 points ?
Question 10 Advances knowledge 10 points	Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field. 10 points ?	Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge 9 points ?	Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 8 points ?	Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 4 points ?	Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field. 0 points ?
Pals et al article: Question 11 Purpose 10 points	Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article. 10 points ?	Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article 9 points ?	Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article. 8 points ?	Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it. 4 points ?	Does not identify any purpose for the research. 0 points ?
Question 12 Research question 10 points	Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given. 10 points ?	Mostly identifies the research question that the author described. 9 points ?	Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described. 8 points ?	Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it. 4 points ?	Does not identify any research question. 0 points ?
Question 13 Research design 10 points	Correctly describes the research design of the study. 10 points ?	Mostly describes the research design of the study. 9 points ?	Somewhat describes the research design of the study. 8 points ?	Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it. 4 points ?	Does not identify any research design. 0 points ?
Question 14 Population 10 points	Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 10 points ?	Mostly describesidentifies and describes the population of the research article. 9 points ?	Somewhatidentifies and describes the population of the research article. 8 points ?	Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article. 4 points ?	Does notidentify any population. 0 points ?
Question 15 Sample 10 points	Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate. 10 points ?	Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate. 9 points ?	Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate. 8 points ?	Misidentifies the sampling approach. 4 points ?	Doesn’t explain any sampling approach. 0 points ?
Question 16 Data collection 10 points	Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail. 10 points ?	Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general. 9 points ?	Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it. 8 points ?	Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information. 4 points ?	Does not describe any data collection procedures. 0 points ?
Question 17 Data analysis 10 points	Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed. 10 points ?	Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed. 9 points ?	Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation. 8 points ?	Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information. 4 points ?	Does not describe how data were analyzed. 0 points ?
Question 18 Limitations 10 points	Correctlydescribes all of the limitations in the study. 10 points ?	Correctlydescribes most of the limitations in the study. 9 points ?	Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two. 8 points ?	Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them. 4 points ?	Does not describe any limitations for the study. 0 points ?
Question 19 Conclusions 10 points	Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions. 10 points ?	Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions. 9 points ?	Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two. 8 points ?	Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them. 4 points ?	Does not describe any author conclusions. 0 points ?
Question 20 Advances knowledge 10 points	Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field. 10 points ?	Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge 9 points ?	Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 8 points ?	Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 4 points ?	Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field. 0 points ?
Style and Writing 25 points	Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. 25 points ?	One to four errors in grammar, spelling, 22 points ?	Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax 20 points ?	Eight to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 10 points ?	Thirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 0 points ?
		Total Points Possible = 225 points

Research Article Critique:

Guidelines and Grading Rubric – Week 6

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to examine, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article. Student is to select an article from a list located in Course Resources. There is a choice of articles from whichyou must choose ONE to complete this assignment.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO #7)

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4 and 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs #4 and 8)

CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs #7 and 8)

Points

The assignment is worth a total of 175 points.

Due Date

You are to submit your paper to the Week 6 Dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.

Requirements

Through this assignment, the student will:

1. Critique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,)

2. Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author’s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5).

Guidelines to writing the Paper

1. Course Resources lists articles from which you are to selectONE to analyze.

2. Retrieve the full-text version of the article from the library. Read it thoroughly.

1. Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention.
   1. Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed.
   2. Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice.
   3. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

4. Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph.

1. 1. Describe the research in greater detail.
   2. Include your observations about this question.
   3. Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question.
   4. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

5. Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.

a. Discuss the research design of the study.

b. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.

c. You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words

6. Describethe sample.

a. Briefly describe the sample size used for this study

b. Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.

c. Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.

d. Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.

e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

7. Describe the data collection method(s)’

a. Who collected the data?

b. What tools were used?

c. What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified.

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

8. Describe the limitations of the study.

a. Identify the limitations within the study

b. Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies

c. Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

9. Describe the findings reported in the study.

a. Describe the findings reported in the study

b. Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study

c. Discuss the credibility of the findings

d. If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?

e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

10. Summary

1. 1. Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper.
   2. Include a statement about the research question and the findings.
   3. Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice?
   4. End with a concluding statement.

11. Citations and Referencesmust be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source.

1. Reference Page: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paperas (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page. A url link alone is not an adequate reference. See the APA Guidelines in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references.

Grading Criteria

Category	Points	%	Description
Research Question	20	11%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the research question for this study your own words.
Design of Study	20	11%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the research design of this study in your own words.
Sample/Population of the Study	25	14%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the sample in your own words.
Data Collection Methods	25	14%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the data collection method(s)’ in your own words.
Limitations	20	12%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the limitations of the study in your own words.
Findings	20	12%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the findings reported in the study in your own words.
Summary of Article (See rubric for categories and breakdown of points.)	25	14%	Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper and discuss theprobability of implementation into practice.
Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling/ APA Formatting	20	12%	No more than 0–3 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. APA formatting is correct with 0–3 errors.
Total	175	100%	A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria	A (100%) Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance	B (88%) Exceeds Very good or high level of performance	C (80%) Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance	NI (38%) Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance	F (0%) Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance
Research question 20 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the research question in detail 20 points ?	Generally, describes, and analyzes the research question 18 points ?	Brieflysummarizes the research question, but omits some aspects of the question. 16 points ?	Incorrectly describes the research question. 8 points ?	Does not describe the research question. 0 points ?
Design of the study 20 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the design of the study in detail. 20 points ?	Generally, describes, and analyzes the design of the study. 18 points ?	Briefly summarizes the design of the study, but omits some aspects of the design. 16 points ?	Incorrectly describes the design of the study. 8 points ?	Does not describe the design of the study 0 points ?
Sample/ population of the study 25 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizesthe sample used in the study in detail. 25 points ?	Generally, describes, and analyzesthe sample used in the study. 22 points ?	Briefly summarizesthe sample used in the study, but omits some details. 20 points ?	Incorrectly describes the sample in the study, or omits major details. 10 points ?	Does not describethe sample used in the study. 0 points ?
Data collection methods 25 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes all ofthe data collection methods used in the study. 25 points ?	Generally, describes, and analyzesthe majority of data collection methods used in the study. 22 points ?	Briefly summarizes and describes parts ofthe data collection method used in the study. 20 points ?	Incorrectly describesthe data collection method used in the study. 10 points ?	Does not describethe data collection method used in the study. 0 points ?
Limitations 20 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizesthe limitations found in the study in detail. 20 points ?	Generally, describes, and analyzes the limitations found in the study. 18 points ?	Briefly summarizes the limitations found in the study. 16 points ?	Incorrectly describes the limitations found in the study. 8 points ?	Does not describe the limitations found in the study. 0 points ?
Findings 20 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the findings of the study in detail. 20 points ?	Generally, describes, and analyzes the findings of the study. 18 points ?	Briefly summarizes the findings of the study. 16 points ?	Incorrectly identifies the findings from the study. 8 points ?	Does not describe the findings of the study. 0 points ?
Summary 25 points	Summarizes study in detail and states specific rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted 25 points ?	Generally, summarizes study. Gives broad rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 22 points ?	Briefly summarizes study and states rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 20 points ?	Minimally summarizes study. Gives poor rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 10 points ?	Does not summarize study and does not give rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 0 points ?
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling/ APA formatting 20 points	No errors in grammar, punctuation, APA, and spelling. 20 points ?	One to four errors in grammar, spelling, 18 points ?	Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax 16 points ?	Eight to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 8 points ?	Thirteen or more errors to the point where it is difficult to understand the meaning of the student’s writing. 0 points ?
Total Points Possible = 175 points

NR439 Articles List for Week 6 Research Article Critique

Katon, W., Russo, J., & Gavin, A. (2014). Predictors of postpartum depression. Journal of Women’s Health (15409996), 23(9), 753-759. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4824. (7p.)

Persistent link to this record (Permalink):

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103890366&site=eds-live&scope=site

Murfet, G. O., Allen, P., &Hingston, T. J. (2014). Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following the implementation of an innovative model of nurse practitioner-led care for diabetes in pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(5), 1150-1163.doi:10.1111/jan.12277. (14p.)

Persistent link to this record (Permalink):

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104059264&site=eds-live&scope=site

Sand-Jecklin, K., &Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(19/20), 2854-2863. doi:10.1111/jocn.12575. (10p.)

Persistent link to this record (Permalink):

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=24606553&site=eds-live&scope=site

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.