Chat with us, powered by LiveChat IFSM301 System Development Life Cycle Research Paper | Writedemy

IFSM301 System Development Life Cycle Research Paper

IFSM301 System Development Life Cycle Research Paper

Question

ystem Development Life Cycle Research PaperPurpose of this Assignment

This assignment gives you the opportunity to apply your research skills, analysis, and critical thinking skills to compare and contrast two different system development life cycle (SDLC) models. This will provide you an opportunity to gain an in-depth understanding of this important IT governance and management tool. This assignment specifically addresses the following course outcome:

· Identify, define, and explain the concepts of information technology governance and management.

Assignment

You will conduct some research to learn about the Waterfall Model of SDLC and another model of your choosing. You will then describe both models and compare and contrast them. Select one of the SDLC models listed below:

· Spiral Model

· Agile (Extreme Programming) Model

· Evolutionary Prototyping Model

· Iterative and Incremental Model

Research and write a paper that describes the Waterfall Model and your chosen model. Your descriptions should include each model’s purpose andstructure (or characteristics) along with its strengths and weaknesses. It should describe the types of system development efforts for which it is most appropriate. Then, compare and contrast your selected model with the Waterfall Model. Finally, you will document the conclusions you reached from your research, which may include such things as which model is “better,” when each model should be used, whether one or the other should not be used, or whether it makes any difference which one is used. The conclusions are your own and will be assessed according to how well you defend them and how convincing your arguments are.

Your paper should be structured as follows:

I. Introduction

II. Waterfall Model (description, purpose, structure/characteristics, strengths and

weaknesses)

III. Chosen Model (description, purpose, structure/characteristics, strengths and

IV.

weaknesses)

Comparison of the Two Models (compare and contrast)

V. Conclusion (conclusions you drew from your research on the two models)

Your paper will be graded on both the accuracy and completeness of your descriptions; it needs to clearly and completely define each model and its strengths and weaknesses. The comparisons will be graded based on the extent to which they are supported by facts and are drawn from the descriptions. The conclusions should be well justified, and drawn from the rest of the paper. Illustrations will enhance your paper if they contribute to an understanding of the model.

Your paper should be 3-5 pages in length (not counting any cover sheet or reference pages). The use of at least three external scholarly resources(other than class materials) is required. You should use scholarly journals(rather than authorless website

11/24/2016 1

postings). If you need assistance with determining what a scholarly journal is, the UMUC library is a very good source of information, accessed via the following link: http://www.umuc.edu/library/libhow/articles.cfm. Remember to correctly cite and referenceall sources using APA format.

Submit your paper in Word format via your Assignments Folder as an attached document with your last name included in the filename.

Grading Rubric

Use the rubric below to be sure you have covered all aspects of this assignment.

90-100% 80-89% 70-79% 60-69% < 60%
Criteria Far Above Above Meets Standards Below Well Below
Standards Standards Standards Standards
5 Points 4 Points 3.5 Points 3 Points 0-2 Points
A sophisticated A well-written The introduction The introduction No
Introduction introduction sets introduction sets adequately sets does not introduction
the stage for the the stage for the the stage for the adequately set included.
paper. paper. paper. the stage for the
paper.

Possible

Points

5

18-20 Points 16-17 Points 14-15 Points 12-13 Points 0-11 Points 20
Description of Description of Description of Description of Description of
waterfall model waterfall model waterfall model waterfall model waterfall
is accurate and is correct and includes may be model is not
thorough; complete; description, incomplete, included or
includes includes purpose, and/or may not little is
Description description, description, characteristics, demonstrate presented.
purpose, purpose, strengths and adequate
of Waterfall
characteristics, characteristics, weaknesses; and understanding
Model
strengths and strengths and demonstrates of course
weaknesses; and weaknesses; adequate concepts.
demonstrates and understanding of
sophisticated demonstrates course concepts.
understanding of good
course concepts. understanding
of course
concepts.
18-20 Points 16-17 Points 14-15 Points 12-13 Points 0-11 Points 20
Description of Description of Description of Description of Description of
chosen model is chosen model is chosen model chosen model chosen model
Description accurate and correct and includes may be is not included
of Chosen thorough; complete; description, incomplete, or little is
Model includes includes purpose, and/or may not presented.
description, description, characteristics, demonstrate
purpose, purpose, strengths and adequate
characteristics, characteristics, weaknesses; and understanding
strengths and strengths and demonstrates
11/24/2016 2

Criteria

Comparison of the Two Models

Conclusion

90-100% 80-89% 70-79% 60-69%
Far Above Above Meets Standards Below
Standards Standards Standards
weaknesses; and weaknesses; adequate of course
demonstrates and understanding of concepts.
sophisticated demonstrates course concepts.
understanding of good
course concepts. understanding
of course
concepts.
23-25 Points 20-22 Points 17-19 Points 15-16 Points
The comparison The comparison The comparison of The comparison
of the two of the two the two models is of the two
models is clear, models is clear, related to the models may not
compelling, and and is directly models; be clear, may
directly related related to the demonstrates not be directly
to the models, models, adequate related to the
demonstrating a demonstrating a understanding of models; and/or
sophisticated good course concepts, may not
understanding of understanding analysis, and demonstrate
course concepts, of course critical thinking. adequate
analysis, critical concepts, understanding
thinking, and analysis, critical of course
synthesis. thinking, and concepts,
synthesis. analysis, and
critical thinking.
9-10 Points 8 Points 7 Points 6 Points
Conclusion is Conclusion is Conclusion is Conclusion is
convincing, somewhat
effective and provided and is
effective and effective and/or
relevant. relevant.
drawn from the relevant.
Demonstrates
paper.
analysis and
Demonstrates
critical thinking.
sophisticated
analysis and
critical thinking.
< 60% Possible
Well Below
Points
Standards
0-14 Points 25

Few or no

comparisons

are provided.

0-5 Points 10

No conclusion provided, or minimal effort demonstrated.

11/24/2016 3

9-10 Points 8 Points 7 Points 6 Points 0-5 Points 10
Three scholarly Three scholarly Three scholarly Three or fewer No external
sources other sources other sources other than sources other research is
than the class than the class the class resources than the class incorporated
resources are resources are are properly resources may or reference
incorporated and incorporated incorporated and be used; may listed is not
used effectively, and used used. Uses APA not be scholarly cited within
contextualized, effectively, format for sources; may text.
appropriately appropriately references and not be properly
researched and researched and citations. incorporated or
External supported, and supported, and used to support
Research synthesized with support original arguments; may
original arguments. rely too heavily
arguments. Sources used on the reporting
Sources used are credible, of external
are credible, relevant, and sources, and/or
relevant, and timely. Proper are not effective
timely. Proper APA style is or appropriate;
APA style is used used for and/or are not
for citations and citations and credible,
references. references. relevant, or
timely. May not
use APA format.

9-10 Points

Paperreflects

effective

organization and

sophisticated

writing; follows

instructions

provided; is

written in third

Format person; uses

correct

structure,

grammar, and

spelling; double-

spaced and

presented in a

professional

format using

Word.

8 Points 7 Points 6 Points 0-5 Points 10
Paper reflects Paper has some Paper is not well Paper is very
effective organization; may organized,
poorly
organization; have some errors and/or contains
written, has
follows in sentence several
many
instructions structure, grammar
grammar
provided; is grammar and and/or spelling
and/or
written in third spelling. Is double errors; and/or is
spelling
person; has few spaced and not double-
errors, or
errors in written in third spaced and
does not
sentence person. written in third
convey the
structure, person.
information.
grammar, and
spelling;
double-spaced,
and presented
in a
professional
format.
TOTAL 100
Points
Possible

11/24/2016 4

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

About Writedemy

We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.

How It Works

To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Are there Discounts?

All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.

Hire a tutor today CLICK HERE to make your first order