09 Jun molecular basis of disease
Question
.gif”>
300551 Molecular Basis of Disease
School of Science & Health│Learning guide
.jpg”>
Spring 2013
Page 1
Table of Contents
1. Unit details…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
Study and attendance expectations……………………………………………………………………………..4
Student workload……………………………………………………………………………………………………………4
Attendance requirements………………………………………………………………………………………………4
Student feedback and improvements to the unit………………………………………………………4
2. Schedule of Learning and Teaching Activities…………………………………………………5
Learning Outcomes…………………………………………………………………………………………………………6
Other Resources………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6
3. Assessment information………………………………………………………………………………………..7
Assessment details………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7
Assessment task 1 : A critical review article (30%)…………………………………………………..8
Assessment task 1 : Standards and Criteria………………………………………………………………..9
Assessment task 2 : Laboratory book (20%)……………………………………………………………10
Assessment task 2 : Standards and Criteria……………………………………………………………..12
Assessment task 3 : Final Examination (50%)…………………………………………………………13
General Submission Requirements……………………………………………………………………………13
Submission…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….13
Late Submission…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….13
Extension of Due Date for Submission………………………………………………………………………13
Resubmission………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..13
Application for Special Consideration……………………………………………………………………….13
4. Important Information…………………………………………………………………………………………14
Links to Policies…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….14
What is academic misconduct?…………………………………………………………………………………..14
What is non-academic misconduct?………………………………………………………………………….14
Raising concerns…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..15
Assignment Cover Sheet………………………………………………………………………………………………16
.jpg”>
Page 2
1. Unit details
.jpg”>
UNIT DETAILS
Unit Code:
300551
Unit Name:
Molecular Basis of Disease
Level:
3
Contact hours
10
per week:
Assumed
300936 Functional Proteins and Genes
Background:
STAFF
Unit
Dr Mark Temple
Coordinator
Building 21, Room 21.1.09, Campbelltown
and point of
first contact
Phone: 4620 3329
Email: m.[email protected].edu.au
Lecture
Dr Graham Jones
Dr Liza Cubeddu
Staff
Building 21, Room 21.1.36,
Building 21, Room 21.1.02
Campbelltown
Campbelltown
Phone: 4620 3399
Phone: 4620 3343
Email: graham.[email protected].edu.au
Email: l.[email protected].edu.au
CONSULTATION ARRANGEMENTS
Campbelltown
Staff: Dr Mark Temple
Date/Time: Friday 4 pm
Venue: Building 21, Room 21.1.09, Campbelltown
.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>
Text Book
1. Lodish H., Berk, A., Matsudaira, P., Kaiser, C.A., Krieger, M., Scott, M.P., Zipursky, L D., Darnell, J. (2004)“Molecular Cell Biology”, W. H. Freeman and Company.
2. Weinberg R. (2006), The Biology of Cancer, Garland Science.
3. Strachan T. and Read, A.P (2004) Human Molecular Genetics, Garland Science.
Edition: [Session] 2013
© Copyright: University of Western Sydney, 2013. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior written permission from the Dean of the School of Science & Health. Copyright for acknowledged materials reproduced herein is retained by the copyright holder. All readings in this publication are copied under licence in accordance with Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968.
.jpg”>
Page 3
Study and attendance expectations
Student workload
For a 10-credit point unit students are expected to work 10 hours per week in total. This means that an average student needs to spend 3-8 hours out of class every week studying this unit. Students are encouraged to read the topic-related material before coming to the lecture in order to follow the presentation.
Attendance requirements
Lectures:
Although lectures are not compulsory, it is highly recommended that students attend lectures and tutorials. During these, all content is discussed and many examples and applications are provided to enhance student learning. The lecture notes available from vUWS are designed to supplement rather than replace live lectures. Material and examples relevant to the assessment tasks are discussed in the lectures.
Laboratory:
Laboratory attendance is compulsory A laboratory manual will be made available to you and pre-work is required to be carried out prior to each class.
Student feedback and improvements to the unit
Introduction of clear standards and criteria
Improvements to the Laboratory manual
.jpg”>
Page 4
2. Schedule of Learning and Teaching Activities
Week
Lecture, Fri 2-4 pm, 04.G.14 (LT03)
1
Introduction/ Developmental Biology
(Mark Temple)
2
The role of cancer genetics in disease
(Mark Temple)
3
Functional genomics
Prac 1
(Graham Jones)
4
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Prac 2
(Graham Jones)
5
Host Genetics and HIV
Prac 3
(Graham Jones)
6
The impact of microarrays on the understanding
Prac 4
of disease
(Graham Jones)
7
DNA repair mechanisms
Prac 5
(Liza Cubeddu)
8
The DNA damage response
Prac 6
(Liza Cubeddu)
Book due at end of
Prac class
9
INTRA-SESSION BREAK
10
Onco-genes and transcription factors in disease
(Mark Temple)
11
Cell cycle regulation and tumour suppressors in
disease
(Mark Temple)
12*
Growth factors and receptors in disease
Assignment due
(Mark Temple)
Monday14/10/13
13
The impact of bioinformatics in understanding
disease
(Mark Temple)
14
Molecular Basis of Disease
(Mark Temple)
.gif”>Learning Outcomes
After satisfactory completion of this unit the student will be able to:
1. Describe the role of genes in the development/differentiation of cells in multicellular organisms.
2. Describe DNA replication and the molecular mechanisms involved in the repair process of mutagenesis and the effects of gene dosage, genomic imprinting and teratogenesis.
3. Explain the basic principles involved in the mutagenic processes behind radiation, diet and oxidative stress.
4. Explain the basis of cancer genetics and the role of growth factors and receptors, oncogenes and transcription factors, the cell cycle and suppressor proteins on the cancer state.
5. Understand the principles of functional genomics.
6. Explain the principles of metabolomics and its relevance for disease diagnosis and prognosis.
7. Appreciate the importance of model organisms for the understanding of human cell biology.
8. Access and interpret information from the scientific literature in the areas of study.
9. Development and extension of laboratory skills for basic molecular biology.
Other Resources
University
Find out about life outside the lecture theatre – news and events, services and facilities,
life
career information and more!
http://www.uws.edu.au/currentstudents/current_students/services_and_facilities
E-Learning
Check your vUWS sites regularly for unit announcements and to keep up with online
discussions. If you do not have access to vUWS please contact e-learning on
https://vuws.uws.edu.au/
Disability
Students with a disability should visit:
Service
http://www.uws.edu.au/currentstudents/current_students/getting_help/disability_servic
es
Course and
This site provides information on pre-requisites, co-requisites and other matters
unit rules
concerning how your course is structured.
http://www.uws.edu.au/currentstudents/current_students/managing_your_study/enrolm
ent/course_and_unit_rules
Student
The Student Learning Unit (SLU) can offer you assistance in writing good exam
Learning
essays. Visit: http://www.uws.edu.au/campuses_structure/cas/services_facilities/slu
Unit
Policies
This site includes the full details of policies that apply to you as a UWS student.
http://www.uws.edu.au/policies/a-z
.jpg”>
Page 6
.gif”>3. Assessment information
Assessment details
There are three assessments in this unit designed to enable students to demonstrate that they have achieved the learning outcomes outlined above. Completion of all assessment items is necessary to receive a final mark in the unit. Achievement of at least 50% overall is required to pass the unit. There is no requirement that each individual assessment must be passed in order to pass the unit.
Assessment task
Learning
Due
Weight
outcomes
Assignment task 1 : A critical review
1.
You are to write a review article describing
8
Week 12
30%
key factors associated with the molecular
basis of disease in the style of a scientific
review publication
Assessment task 2 : Laboratory book
2.
You are expected to keep compliant
9
Week 8
20%
laboratory notebook
Assessment task 3 : Final examination
3.
Consist of a combination multiple choice
1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
Exam period
50%
and/or short answer and/or essay questions.
6, 7
Duration is 3 hours
TOTAL
100%
.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>
Page 7
.gif”>Assessment task 1 : A critical review article (30%).
.jpg”>
One of the most widely read story in “Technology Review” was “Do You Want to Live Forever?”’ a profile of Dr. Aubrey de Grey. De Grey believes that disease and aging can be treated and defeated. In this article he proposes approaching aging as a problem in engineering through “Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence (SENS).” Through SENS he claims to identify the 7 causes of human aging and proposes how each cause might be circumvented.
This assignment is to be carried out in pairs. Together you are to critique SENS from two different view points. Firstly that SENS is so wrong that they are unworthy of learned debate and secondly that SENS is worthy of serious consideration. You are expected to question the information and opinions from general literature and media sources and from relevant peer reviewed articles. Explain the background science and discuss whether the proposals are feasible. Together you are to present a final evaluation of SENS in relation to the molecular basics of disease and discuss whether circumvention by SENS is either highly speculative or grounded in fact.
As background material listen to Aubrey de Grey at TED:
http://www.ted.com/speakers/aubrey_de_grey.html
A PDF copy of the “Do You Want to Live Forever?” article is available on the vUWS website (note, this is NOT a peer reviewed article). As you critique the proposals it is important that you reference science material primarily from peer reviewed sources rather than popular web sites, text books or other commentary.
Use the Author Date format for in-text citations and referencing based on Harvard style: http://library.uws.edu.au/FILES/cite_Harvard.pdf
The maximum length is to be 2000 words (excluding, figure legends and references).
.jpg”>
A signed hard copy of the assignment cover sheet is to be given to Dr Mark Temple (Office 21.1.09) and an electronic copy of the assignment is to be submitted via the turnitin link (in the assignment folder on the units vUWS site) before 5 pm Monday of Week 12 (14th Oct 2013).
.jpg”>
Page 8
.gif”>Assessment task 1 : Standards and Criteria
Research
Standards
report
Criteria
High
Distinction
Credit
Pass
Fail
Distinction
Quality of
Is a balanced
Is a balanced
Shows
Shows
Poor summary
Critique
discussion and
discussion of
understanding
awareness
and evaluation of
10%
evaluation of
the strengths,
of the topic
of the
the articles.
the strengths,
weakness of
from different
proposal
weakness and
the articles.
perspectives
from
notable features
different
of the articles.
perspectives
Quality of
Scientific
Scientific
Scientific
Scientific
Scientific
written
content is fully
content is
content is
Content is
Content is poorly
scientific
stated,
mostly well
stated, and
stated, and
stated, and
content
comprehended
stated,
discussed
poorly
poorly discussed
10%
and discussed.
comprehended
discussed
and discussed
Research
Information is
Information is
Information is
Information
Information is
ability and
primarily from
mostly from
sometimes
is gathered
gathered from a
quality of
many peer
few peer
from few peer
from text
unreliable or
sources
reviewed
reviewed
reviewed
books and
unacknowledged
5%
sources.
sources.
sources, text
internet sites
sources.
books and
quality
internet sites
Format and
Format, layout,
Format,
Format,
Format,
Poorly structure
organisation
Reference list,
layout,
layout,
layout,
with missing
5%
Author-Date
Reference list,
Reference list,
Reference
sections and
citations,
Author-Date
Author-Date
list, Author-
major errors or
Tables and
citations,
citations,
Date
no Author-Date
Figures are
Tables and
Tables and
citations,
citations.
highly
Figures are
Figures are
Tables and
organized,
organized,
organized,
Figures are
demonstrates
demonstrates
with minor
highly
logical
logical
errors
organized,
sequencing and
sequencing
with major
structure.
and structure.
errors
TOTAL 30%
.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>.jpg”>
Page 9
.gif”>Assessment task 2 : Laboratory book (20%)
Guide to keeping a laboratory notebook
A notebook should be kept for laboratory experiments only using a Scientific Notebook or other bound book. The notebook should be written in ink, and each page signed and dated. Mistakes are not to be erased but should be marked out with a single line. Try to keep your notebook with the idea that someone else must be able to read and understand what you have done. The notebook should always be up-to-date and can be collected at any time.
Index: An index containing the titleof each experiment and the page number should be included atthe beginning of the notebook.
Essentially everything you do in the laboratory should be in your notebook. The notebook should be organized by experiment. Start each new experiment on a new page. The top of the page should contain the title of the experiment, the date, and the page number. The page number is important for indexing, referring to previous experiments, and for labelling materials used in a given experiment. If an experiment spans more than one page, note the page on which the experiment continues if it’s not on the next page.
No data is to be recorded on loose sheets of paper or on the protocol sheets.
Title/Purpose: Every experiment should have a title and it should be descriptive. An examplewould be “Small-scale preparation of plasmid pUC19 for ……”.
When starting a new weeks entry, it is a good idea to introduce and write up the overall strategy prior to beginning, this may take the form of a flow diagram or a written section. This serves two purposes.
• First, it forces you to think about what you are doing and why,…. and sometimes things look differently when written down than they do in your head.
• Second, ideas can be patented, and a thorough description of your hypothesis and experimental strategy with appropriate documentation can be helpful for any future intellectual property issues.
Background information:This section should include any information that is pertinent to theexecution of the experiment or to the interpretation of the results. For example, if it is a repeat experiment, state what will be done differently to get the experiment to work. A simple drawing of the plasmid, PCR product expected or chemical to be used can be helpful. This is not like an introduction to a paper. Include anything that will be helpful in carrying out the experiment and deciphering the experiment at a later date. For the most part, notebooks are not written just for today but for you or somebody else to read in the future.
Materials:This section should include the key materials, i.e., solutions or equipment, that will beneeded. It is not necessary to include every piece of lab equipment required, i.e. vortexer, pipetman, etc, but you should include any specialized equipment and the manufacturer, i.e., a image documentation equipment or PCR instrument. Composition of all buffers should be included unless they are standard or are referenced. Pre-packaged kits should be identified as to the name of the kit, the vendor, and the catalogue number. Biological samples should be identified by genus and species, strain number, tissue type, and/or genotype with the source of the material identified.
.jpg”>
Page 10
.gif”>Enzymes should be identified by name, vendor, and concentration. DNA samples should be identified as to
• type of DNA, i.e., chromosomal, plasmid, etc,
• purity (miniprep, gel purified, PCR product)
• concentration, if known
• source, (include prior experiment number if the DNA was isolated in a previous experiment).
Include all calculations made in preparing solutions. The sequence of all oligonucleotides must be included or referenced. Agarose gels should be identified by percentage and buffer used. If any of these materials were used in previous experiments, include only the reference to that earlier experiment, do not repeat the information again.
Procedure: Write down exactly what you are going to do before you do it and make sure youunderstand each step before you do it.
• You should include everything you do including all volumes and amounts; many protocols are written for general use and must be adapted for a specific application.
• Writing a procedure out helps you to remember and to understand what it is about. It will also help you to identify steps that may be unclear or that need special attention.
• Some procedures can be several pages long and include more information than is necessary in a notebook.
Flow charts are sometimes helpful for experiments that have many parts. Tables are also useful if an experiment includes a set of reactions with multiple variables. It is good practice to check off steps as they are completed or reagents as they are added to prevent you from losing you place or for forgetting to add something.
Results: This section should include allraw data, including gel photographs, printouts, gel images,etc. All lanes on gel photographs must be labelled and always identify the source and the amount of any standards. This section should also include your analyzed data, for example, identification of products, calculations etc. All images should be labelled eg Fig. 1. Also give the Figure a meaningful title and a short description (legend). Be sure to refer to the Figure in your text (narrative/ description etc).
Conclusions/Summary: This is one of the most important sections. You should summarize all ofyour results, even if they were stated elsewhere and state any conclusions you can make. If the experiment didn’t work, what went wrong and what will you do the next time to try to trouble shoot?
Questions: There are questions to be written up as part of your preparation for each weeks class.These are intended to supplement your background knowledge so that you have a better appreciation of what you are doing and why you are doing it.
.jpg”>
Page 11
.gif”>Assessment task 2 : Standards and Criteria
.jpg”>
High
Distinction
>=17%
Distinction
15 < 17% Credit 13 < 17% Pass 10 < 13% Fail < 10% Standards and Criteria All required sections are present and are formatted correctly (including name of lab partner, title of the exercise, date work was done) Notebook is neat, orderly and legible Tables, graphs and data are used appropriately and are of proper size and format Pages are dated and signed Proper protocols are followed in regard to errors, empty space, etc. Procedural Outline concisely written in student’s own words Changes to procedure are noted Results section is written in complete sentences and is a complete recounting of what was done and what was observed All required sections are present and are formatted correctly Notebook is by and large neat, orderly and legible Tables, graphs and data are used appropriately and are of proper size and format Most pages are dated and signed Proper protocols are followed in regard to errors, empty space, etc. Procedural Outline written in student’s own words Changes to procedure are noted Results section is generally written in complete sentences and is a complete recounting of what was done and what was observed, although there may be occasional lapses Most required sections are present, although some may be formatted incorrectly Notebook has significant lapses of neatness, orderliness and legibility Necessary tables, graphs and data are present, but are lacking in some way (e. g., table headings, graph axis labels, etc.) Only a few pages are dated or signed Haphazard application of proper protocols regarding errors, empty space, etc. Procedural Outline largely a repetition of given material Changes to procedure may be noted Results section consists mainly of random observations and jotted down numbers One or more required sections are missing or formatted incorrectly Necessary tables, graphs and data are present, but are lacking in several important features Pages are not dated or signed Haphazard application of proper protocols regarding errors, empty space, etc. Procedural Outline essentially a copy of the given procedure with minor changes Changes to procedure are not noted Results section consists mainly of random observations and jotted down numbers or results are recorded in the Procedural Outline May have only one or two sections present or labelled properly Illegible writing, haphazard placement of records within the notebook Missing tables, graphs and data, what is present is not formatted properly Pages are not dated or signed No apparent set of rules used to prepare the notebook Procedural Outline is a simple recopying of the laboratory exercise with minor changes Changes to procedure are not noted Results are missing or consist only of numbers presented without context .jpg">
Page 12
.gif”>Assessment task 3 : Final Examination (50%)
The exam is to be held in the Examimations period following Stuvac.
Criterion
Standards
Fail: achieve less than 50% of marks
Pass: achieve 50-64% marks
Produce the correct answer
Credit: achieve 65-74% marks
Distinction: achieve 75-84% marks
High Distinction: achieve 85% or greater marks
General Submission Requirements
Submission
All assignments must be submitted by the specified due date and time, using a completed and signed Assignment Cover Sheet provided in the last page of this document.
Complete your assignment, attach a completed and signed Assignment Cover Sheet, and follow the individual assessment items instructions on how to submit.
Late Submission
If you submit a late assessment, without receiving approval for an extension of time, (see next item), you will be penalised by 10% per day for up to 10 days. In other words, marks equal to 10% of the assignment’s weight will be deducted from the mark awarded.
For example, if the highest mark possible is 50, 5 marks will be deducted from your awarded mark for each late day
Saturday and Sunday each count as one calendar day
Assessments will not be accepted after the marked assessment task has been returned to students This is consistent with Clause 50 of the University of Western Sydney’s Assessment Policy – Criteria and Standards-Based Assessment.
Extension of Due Date for Submission
Extensions are only granted in exceptional circumstances. To apply for an extension of time:
Locate an application form via the UWS homepage or copy the following link: http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/118273/Request_for_Extension_RO_00205_01 12.pdf
Application forms must be submitted to the Campus Co-ordinator
Requests for extension should be made no later than 3 working days before the due date of an assignment or other assessment item including web-based quizzes
Appropriate, supporting documentation must be submitted with the application
An application for an extension does not automatically mean that an extension will be approved Assessments will not be accepted after the marked assessment task has been returned to students
Resubmission
Resubmission of assessment items will not normally be granted if requested
Application for Special Consideration
It is strongly recommended that you attend all scheduled learning activities to support your learning. If you have suffered misadventure, illness, or you have experienced exceptional circumstances that have prevented your attendance at class or your completion and submission of assessment tasks you
.jpg”>
Page 13
.gif”>may need to apply for Special Consideration via the UWS website http://www.uws.edu.au/currentstudents/current_students/services_and_facilities/special_considerati on2or the Student Centre. Special Consideration is not automatically granted. It is your responsibility to ensure that any missed content has been covered. Your lecturer will give you more information on how this must be done.
4. Important Information
Links to Policies
The University has a number of policies that relate to teaching and learning. Important policies affecting students include:
§ Assessment Policy
§ Bullying Prevention Policyand Guidelines
§ Enrolment Policy(includes a section on the UWS Student Email Account)
§ Examinations Policy
§ Misconduct – Student Academic Misconduct Policy(see extract below)
§ Misconduct – Student Non-academic Misconduct Policy(see extract below)
§ Review of Grade Policy
§ Sexual Harassment Prevention Policy
§ Special Consideration Policy
§ Teaching and Learning – Fundamental Code
There are two policies that relate to misconduct – academic and non-academic misconduct. Breaches of these policies can have very serious consequences. It is essential that you are familiar with these policies and how to avoid misconduct of any type.
What is academic misconduct?
Academic misconduct may involve plagiarism, collusion or cheating. Plagiarism involves submitting or presenting work in a unit as if it were the student’s own work when, in fact, it was not. Collusion includes inciting, assisting, facilitating, concealing or being involved in plagiarism, cheating or other academic misconduct with others. Cheating includes dishonest conduct (or attempted dishonest conduct) in exams.
For the full definition of academic misconduct and the consequences of such behaviour, you are advised to read the Misconduct – Student Academic Misconduct Policy in its entirety (refer to http://policies.uws.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00051).
There are many resources to help you avoid academic misconduct. Library staff can help you with referencing and the Student Learning Unit can assist with academic writing and plagiarism. If you are unsure about any of your work you should also ask your tutor or lecturer for advice and feedback. The University also has text matching software (called Turnitin) which can help you check to see if your work might have problems. You can access Turnitin on the vUWS site for this unit.
What is non-academic misconduct?
Non-academic misconduct includes unlawful activities and crimes, falsifying documents (like a medical certificate or academic records), harassing other students (or staff), stealing or damaging university property (like library books or computers) and disrupting other students or staff. These are just some of the types of non -academic misconduct and while these things are rare they do happen. If you believe you have been the victim of non-academic misconduct or you are aware of any academic misconduct it is very important that you report it.
.jpg”>
Page 14
.gif”>You should report all matters of non-academic misconduct directly to the Dean or the head of the relevant section of the University. For example, you can report matters to the Manager of Security on your campus or to the Campus Provost or the Dean of your school. You must do this in writing. You may write to the Dean on g.[email protected].edu.au.
Raising concerns
If you have a concern about this unit please contact your lecturer or tutor in the first instance. If the matter is not resolved, then you may contact the unit coordinator (see inside front cover). If you would prefer to speak to someone else, you are advised to contact the Director of Academic Program responsible for th
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.
