12 Jun Outsourcing A Division
Option #1: Outsourcing a Division
Assume you are a strategic leader in a large international manufacturing organization. The organization has experienced a significant loss in revenue over the last two years; now you must consider outsourcing a division to another country in order to reduce expenditures and sustain the company for years to come. Given that your role as a strategic leader is to focus on long-term planning, you must ensure that your decision making is effective and will meet the overall organizational goal of sustainment. Thus, address the following:
- Describe the steps you would take in evaluating the decisions to be made in this situation.
- Explore whether or not you would use prescriptive or descriptive decision making.
- Explain your reasoning for the type of decision making you selected.
- Evaluate the critical thinking skills you think are necessary to make this decision.
The focus of this assignment is on the steps that you would take as a leader while going through the decision-making process, rather than the actual decision that you would make.
Assignment Requirements:
The length and formatting requirements are as follows:
- Cite a minimum of four scholarly sources to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to the textbook, three of which should be academic, peer-reviewed sources
- Your assignment should feature a PowerPoint slideshow that includes 8-10 slides, not counting the required title and references slides. If you do not have access to PowerPoint, you may use a program such as Google, SlideRocket, Prezi, or another software application to create your presentation. Embed voice narration in your presentation, or follow the directions above for a written script and submit it separately. Familiarize yourself with the program you choose early in the process.
- Your slides must feature content in the Notes section that elaborates on your bullet points.
- Format your assignment according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Be sure to review the Critical Thinking Assignment rubric in the Module 1 folder for details regarding grading standards.
Rubric
ORG525 Mod 1 CT
ORG525 Mod 1 CTCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge related to leadership and decision making; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
4.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in leadership and decision making.
12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
6.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are lessâ€than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
6.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format.Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.10.0 pts
Total Points: 75.0
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.