Question Evaluation of Marginalized Women Guidelines & Grading Rubric

15 Jun Question Evaluation of Marginalized Women Guidelines & Grading Rubric

Question
Evaluation of Marginalized Women Guidelines & Grading Rubric

Evaluation of Marginalized Women Guidelines & Grading Rubric

Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to

Provide learners with the opportunity to integrate knowledge and skills learned throughout this course
Directly apply principles and knowledge learned in the course to problem solving of population health problems in marginalized women.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

1. Integrate current evidence based clinical practice guidelines in the care of childbearing and childrearing families.

2. Appropriately apply anticipatory guidance and health promotion in the care of childbearing and childrearing families.

3. Assess growth and developmental milestones in the care of childbearing and childrearing families.

4. Construct an evidence based reproductive health management plan.

5. Identify and address healthcare needs of marginalized childbearing and childrearing families

Requirements
This paper should clearly and comprehensively identify the disease or population health problem chosen. The problem must be an issue in your geographic area and a concern for the population you will serve upon graduation with your degree. The paper should be organized into the following sections:

1. Introduction with a clear presentation of the marginalized group as well as significance and a scholarly overview of the paper.

2. Background of the marginalized group/problem including description, current incidence and/or prevalence statistics current state, local, and national statistics pertaining to the problem.

3. Discuss the economic aspects of the marginalized group

4. Discuss social justice and its relationship to health disparities and health care of marginalized group.

5. Discuss ethical issues on marginalized group

6. Provide a brief plan of how you will address this marginalized group in your practice once you are finished with school. Provide three actions you will take along with how you will measure outcomes of your actions.

7. Conclude in a clear manner with a brief overview of key points of the entire problem

Preparing the Paper
· Choose one topic from the following list:

· Female Veterans

· Incarcerated Women

· Lesbians CHOOSE TOPIC FROM HIGHLIGHTED

· Transgender Women PLEASE

· Women with HIV

· Women Sex Workers

· Women with Mental Illness

· Women Immigrants

· Women with Past Sexual Assault

·

·

· Paper Length: 5-6 pages, excluding title/cover and reference pages

· APA format 6th edition

·

Directions and Grading Criteria
Category

Points

Possible

Points Earned

Comments

Scholarly Introduction (clear presentation of marginalized group)

20

Background and significance of the marginalized group (includes incidence or prevalence statistics)

20

Socio-Economic aspects of the marginalized group

20

Social justiceand its relationship to health disparities and health care of marginalized group

20

Ethical issues of the marginalized group

25

Plan of action (includes at least three evidenced based actions, supported by literature, that the student will take in their own practice and how outcomes will be measured)

30

Conclusion

10

Mechanics of writing, APA

5

Total

150

Total Points earned =

A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the criteria requirements.

REFERENCES CANNOT BE MORE THAN 5YRS OLD PLEASE ! REAL SCHOLARLY ARTICLES NOT MADE UP. PLEASE DO EXACTLY AS RUBRIC AND GUIDELINES STATES PLEASE

Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Identification of the chosen marginalized group

20 Points

18 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

Comprehensively identifies the chosen marginalized group.

Adequately identifies chosen marginalized group.

Identification of chosen marginalized group is limited.

Identification of chosen marginalized group is unclear.

Identification of chosen marginalized group is missing or not discussed.

Background and significance of the marginalized group (includes incidence and prevalence statistics)

20 Points

18 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

Comprehensive review of background and significance of chosen marginalized group. Curent evidence supports background.

An adequate review of background but limited review of incidence or prevalence. Current evidence supports background and significance.

Limited review of Background AND limited review of incidence/prevalence. OR Lack current evidence to support.

Background, incidence and prevalence is unclear. missing one or more key point (background, prevelance or incidence). AND Lack of evidence to support.

Background and significance of the marginalized group is not discussed.

Socio-Economic issues of the problem

20 Points

18 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

Clearly presents and fully explains the socio economic issues of marginalized group with current supporting evidence.

Adequate review of socio-economic issues of marginalized group with current supporting evidence.

Limited review of the socio-economic issues of marginalized group ORLack of current supporting evidence.

Minimal or unclear review socio-economic issues of marginalized group ANDlack of current supporting evidence.

Socio-Economic issue(s) not reviewed.

Social justiceand its relationship to health disparities and health care of chosen marginalized group

20 Points

18 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

Comprehensive review social injustice is discussed along with its relationship to health disparitities and health care. Supported by current scholarly evidence.

Adequate review of social injustice with some discussion of its relationship to health disparities and health care but lacks one major point or is not succinct. supported by current scholarly evidence.

Limited review of social injustice. Limitied discussion of relationship to health disparitities and health care. Main points lack detailed development.

Supported by current scholarly evidence.

Minimal review of social injustice. Minimal discussion of relationship to health disparitities and health care.

OR

Information presented is NOT Supported by current scholarly evidence.

No discussion of social injustice and relationship to health disparitities and health care.

Ethical issues of the chosen marginalized group

25 Points

22 Points

21 Points

10 Points

0 Points

Comprehensive review of ethical issuescurrent supporting evidence.

Adequate review of ethical issues.Main points lack detailed development. Current supporting evidence.

Limited review of ethical issues. list ethical issues or arrange them randomly rather than using any logical structure.

OR

Lack of cuurent supporting evidence.

Minimal or unclear review of ethical issuesANDlack of current supporting evidence.

Ethical issues are not discussed.

Plan of action (includes at least three evidenced based actions, supported by literature, that the student will take in their own practice and how outcomes will be measured)

30 Points

26 Points

24 Points

12 Points

0 Points

A comprehensive plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group; three evidence-based actions to address the impact AND outcomes of the marginalized group. Supported by current scholarly evidence.

An adequate, but not fully comprehensive, plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group;

OR

Two evidence- based actions fully discussed to address the impact ANDoutcomes of the marginalized group. Supported by current scholarly evidence.

A limited plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group; Two evidence-based actionsdiscussed to address the impact.

Outcomes notdiscussed.

Limited or little current evidence used for support.

Plan is unclear OR Oneevidence- based actions discussed to address the impact.

Outcomes not discussed

ANDLack of current supporting evidence.

Plan of action not provided.

Conclusion

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

The conclusion thoroughly, clearly, succinctly, and logically presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action.

The conclusion presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action, but lacks one major point or is not succinct.

The conclusion is a limited review of key points of the paper, is not succinct, or lacks one or more major points of the paper or clear direction for action.

Conclusion is unclear or significantly limited in overview of the paper.

Conclusion not provided.

Grammar, Spelling, APA

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

2 Points

0 Points

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero errors.

One to three errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

Four to six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

Seven to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

Post contains ten or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and punctuation

OR repeatedly makes the same errors throughout the paper.