answer each discussion as a separate work and each discussion needs a separate references In Proper apa format

04 May answer each discussion as a separate work and each discussion needs a separate references In Proper apa format

Work #1 Answer in APA format with 1 citations per paragraph treat each answer as a separate work or file and each work SOCW 04week 6 return to my posted discussions

Learning Resources to be used as references to support your answer.

Note:  To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the  Course Materials  section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

Gehlert, S., & Browne, T. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of health social work (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

· Chapter 5, “Health Policy and Social Work” (pp. 100–124)

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cms.gov/

Burg, M. A., Zebrack, B., Walsh, K., Maramaldi, P., Lim, J. W., Smolinski, K. M., & Lawson, K. (2010). Barriers to accessing quality health care for cancer patients: A survey of members of the association of oncology social work. Social Work in Health Care, 49(1), 38–52.

Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Chaumba, J. (2011). Health status, use of health care resources, and treatment strategies of Ethiopian and Nigerian immigrants in the United States. Social Work in Health Care, 50(6), 466–481.

Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Allen, H. (2012). Is there a social worker in the house? Health care reform and the future of medical social work. Health and Social Work, 37(3), 183–186.

Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Collins, S. (2012). Essential health benefits & the Affordable Care Act: What social workers need to know. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/assets/secured/documents/practice/health/essentialhealthbenefits.pdf

Gross, W., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J., Pasek, J., Sood, G., … Junius, D. (n.d.). Americans’ attitudes toward the Affordable Care Act: Would better public understanding increase or decrease favorability? Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/dept/communication/faculty/krosnick/docs/2012/Health%20Care%202012%20-%20Knowledge%20and%20Favorability.pdf

Lindberg, E. (2013). What will Obamacare mean to social work? Retrieved from http://sowkweb.usc.edu/news/what-will-obamacare-mean-social-work

Reisch, M. (2012). The challenges of health care reform for hospital social work in the United States. Social Work in Health Care, 51(10), 873–893.

Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Optional Resources

American College of Physicians. (2011). How can our nation conserve and distribute health care resources effectively and efficiently?Retrieved from http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/current_policy_papers/assets/health_care_resources.pdf

Darnell, J. S. (2013). Navigators and assisters: Two case management roles for social workers in the Affordable Care Act. Health & Social Work, 38(2), 123–126.

Society for Human Resource Management. (n.d.). Health care reform resource page. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/benefits/Articles/Pages/HealthCareReform.aspx

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.hrsa.gov/index.html

This is my posted discussion for SOCW 04 week6 discussion #1 that the students are making the comments from. Not a work READ ONLY!

Work #1 Answer in APA format with 1 citations per paragraph treat each answer as a separate work or file and each work or file need separate references. At least 350 word each answer if you can. Support your posts with specific references to the Learning Resources given in this work. Be sure to provide full APA citations for your references. Treat each work, file or answer as a separate work and each work or answer needs separate references. Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the resources and the current literature given in the work using appropriate APA format and style

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of your colleagues’ comments.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the resources and the current literature using appropriate APA format and style.

Work A. Alicia Muldrow (title of work A.)

RE: Discussion 2 – Week 6 

Collapse

Top of Form

Total views: 6 (Your views: 1)

Correcting reference

COLLAPSE

Thank you for discussing the impact of the ACA on medical social workers.  With the increase in opportunity for individuals with preexisting conditions to obtain insurance, that would result in a larger caseload for medical social workers.  Social workers strive to fight social oppression (NASW, 2017).  With individuals that are newly able to obtain health insurance, great assistance and coordination is needed to insure they linked to appropriate services, provided with the proper supports and treatment plan to obtain services that was previously unreachable due to the lack of insurance.  I can now visualize that the ACA brought additional opportunity to the field of medical social.  With increased opportunity to provide assistance comes the increased opportunity to bring exposure to our field.

Reference

The National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.uaf.edu/socwork/student-information/checklist/(D)-NASW-Code-of-Ethics.pdf

Name: SOCW_6204_Week6_Discussion_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Responsiveness to Directions	Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Discussion posting fully addresses all instruction prompts, including responding to the required number of peer posts. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26.97 (26.97%) Discussion posting addresses most of the instruction prompts, including responding to the required number of peer posts. However, one or more prompts may have been insufficiently addressed. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23.97 (23.97%) Discussion posting addresses some of the instructions prompts, but may have missed several prompts, did not sufficiently address the majority of prompts, and/or made less than the required number of response posts. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20.97 (20.97%) Discussion posting does not address the majority of instruction prompts, insufficiently addresses all instruction prompts, and/or made less than the required number of response posts. Feedback:
Content	Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26.97 (26.97%) Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23.97 (23.97%) Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20.97 (20.97%) Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow, and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Feedback:
Peer Feedback and Interaction	Points: Points Range: 22.5 (22.5%) – 25 (25%) The feedback postings and responses to questions are excellent and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22.48 (22.48%) The feedback postings and responses to questions are good but may not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 17.5 (17.5%) – 19.98 (19.98%) The feedback postings and responses to questions only partially contribute to the quality of interaction by offering insufficient constructive critique or suggestions, shallow questions, or providing poor quality additional resources. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17.48 (17.47%) Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the feedback postings and responses to questions do not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critique, suggestions, questions, or additional resources. Feedback:

Bottom of Form

58f9fea8-34fc-492

false

Exit

%7B%220.270000

%7B%220.240000

%7B%220.210000

%7B%220.000000

%7B%220.225000

%7B%220.200000

%7B%220.175000

PUBLISHED