06 Jul PHILOSOPHY OF COMPOSITION.
Literary Criticism
Order Description
Write a 2500 word essay on ONE of the following essays from the Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism .
LIST ONE
Horace Ars Poetica. [NTC: 122-133] .
Pierre Corneille Of the Three Unities of Action Time and Place. [NTC: 288- 300] David Hume Of the Standard of Taste. [NTC: 392-405] .
Edgar Allan Poe The Philosophy of Composition. [NTC: 639-647] . Walter Pater Studies in the History of the Renaissance. [NTC 724-730] . Gyrgy Lukcs The Historical Novel. [NTC: 909-921] .
Adrienne Rich Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. [NTC: 1591-1609] .
Edward Sad Orientalism. [NTC: 1866-1888] .
Barbara Christian The Race For Theory. [NTC 2128-2137] Your answer should address the following three objectives:
a) To give a concise prcis of the essay.
b) To enter into a critical discussion of the essay.
c) To locate the essay in relation to the history of criticism and specifically to compare or contrast it with TWO other extracts from the Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism as discussed in the lecture programme
[see CP: Criticism lecture schedule above]. Although your essay should be written in continuous prose you should draw attention to the point in your essay at which you turn to each of these elements. You are free to decide the balance between the three elements in your essay for yourself for example you may find that an extended comparison is the best way to focus a critical discussion of the extract but you should bear in mind that the marking of the assessment will depend on having adequately addressed all three elements. In many ways the analytical techniques you will use in putting together the essay are similar to those you will have put to work in first and second year. However as we will see in the lecture course responding to a critical argument and responding to a literary text are different sorts of exercise and require different forms of judgement. Because throughout your work at honours level you will be required to respond to critics as well as to literary texts this exercise aims to help you explore appropriate forms of judgement. The following notes are intended to help you think about each of the objectives of the assessment exercise:
a. To give a concise prcis of the essay. A prcis is not simply a statement of the authors intention. Rather it is an overview of their argument which considers not only what they set out to do but how they do it: whether they devote space to conceptual analysis or give literary examples. Consequently you should aim to address the extract as a whole and not just focus on the beginning or on the conclusion. It might also consider the genre of the piece: is it a manifesto or statement of intent? is it a critical review or polemical riposte to another critic? is it analytical or impressionistic in form? An effective prcis is more than a summary of an extract it is a critical analysis in its own right because you will be drawing attention to what are the central lines of argument or investigation and what are subordinate ones. However this will involve the exercise of your own critical judgement: for example it would be up to you to identify the key arguments of the extract and what are merely examples given in support of that argument.
b. To enter into a critical discussion of the essay. Once you have given your prcis which we now see to mean something like an analytical summary you are in a position to enter into a critical discussion of the extract. The prcis is an essential prerequisite for your critical discussion because it is only reasonable to judge the success or validity of an argument once we have clearly understood what it is trying to achieve: it is not helpful to state that instead of doing one thing an author should have tried to do something else. (Although note that you will have an opportunity to make this sort of point through comparison with another author who has chosen to do something different.) You might also bear in mind that just as literary criticism does not mean pointing out flaws and mistakes in a text so a critical discussion does not require you to find fault with an extract. At a very basic level it means drawing attention to features of interest in the piece but more specifically it might mean exploring a combination of any number of the following questions: ? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the critical argument? ? Are there specific assumptions or circumstances that we need to be aware of before we can understand the argument or that we need to bear in mind if we wish to make an assessment of its success? ? To what extent are the author of the extract and its arguments products of a particular time and place? ? To what extent are these arguments about criticism still relevant today? ? Is the approach to literature demonstrated by the extract more relevant to some literary forms or periods than to others? ? Is the style of the extract significant? ? If so why the author has chosen to write in this particular style? ? Does the style of the extract make a difference to the analytical or persuasive force of the argument?
c. To locate the essay in relation to the history of criticism and specifically to compare or contrast it with TWO other extracts from the Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism as discussed in the lecture programme. One aim of the course is to give you a sense not only of changing ideas of criticism over the ages but also of continuity: that we may still be doing the same things with texts or thinking about them using the same terms and categories as much older writers. This final element of the assessment asks you to address this by looking at the essay you have chosen in relation to 2 of the extracts which were analysed in the lectures (see CP: Criticism lecture schedule above for details). An ideal answer will seek to show both similarities and differences for example by seeing how two authors go about different ways to reach similar ends or how two authors draw different conclusions from similar starting points. Or you might be interested in the ways that quite different accounts of criticism sometimes turn out to harbour very similar unacknowledged or unexamined assumptions about the nature of literature or literary study. Your aim is not so much to classify or label critical arguments (this is neo-classical whereas that is romantic) but to explore particular similarities and differences between the work of specific critics. After all it is only on the basis of such specific comparisons that a historian of criticism can draw generalisations about schools of criticism; and the test of a good historian will always be the extent to which they complicate such generalisations. Think of this as a way of revising the course: looking back over what has been discussed in the lectures and seeing what larger patterns of similarity and difference you can see in the way that the critical enterprise has been discussed or conceived over the last two millennia.
Please compare you chosen text with TWO texts from the following list:
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.