Social Policy: 3-4 pages Select and describe one or more of the most re

Social Policy: 3-4 pages

Select and describe one or more of the most relevant social policies relevant to the practice situation. This policy section refers to state and federal policies (laws, court decisions, or regulations), not agency policy. Be sure to cite the laws and policies correctly (as you should with all literature you reference).

Briefly explain the policy and how it is relevant to your client’s area of concern/problem situation.

Use a policy analysis model to analyze the effectiveness of the policy for the general client group you have chosen and then your client specifically. Include carefully referenced literature sources including books; peer-reviewed journal articles; research studies; government documents, reports and data; and web sites.

While this is not expected in the space available to be a full policy analysis,

you should draw on one of the policy analysis models with which you are familiar, and reference the model fully.

Based on your analysis, what would you advocate in terms of policy review, application, formulation, or revision?

Rubric

Section IIB: Policy Analysis Section IIB: Policy Analysis Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Policy Selection Selected and discussed an appropriate policy or policies (2.0 to >1.0 pts Excellent) (1.0 to >0 pts Poor or Missing) 2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Rationale Provided an appropriate rationale for policy selected (2.0 to >1.0 pts Excellent)

(1.0 to >0 pts Poor or Missing) 2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Citations Appropriately included and referenced evidence-based knowledge and literature related to the selected policy and its application

(3.0 to >2.0 pts. Excellent) 

(2.0 to >1.0 pts Needs improvement) (1.0 to >0 pts Poor or Missing) 3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Policy Analysis Model Discussed strengths and limitations of selected policy using a policy analysis model

(5.0 to >3.0 pts Excellent) (3.0 to >1.0 pts Needs Improvement) 

(1.0 to >0 pts Poor or Missing) 5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advocacy Adequately discussed advocacy as it relates to policy review, application, formulation or revision

(3.0 to >2.0 pts Excellent) (2.0 to >1.0 pts Needs improvement) 

(1.0 to >0 pts Poor or Missing) 3.0 pts

Total Points: 15.0