ANALYZE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAWS AND ASSESS THEIR IMPACT ON ORGANIZATIONS.

24 Jul ANALYZE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAWS AND ASSESS THEIR IMPACT ON ORGANIZATIONS.

Ethics and Corporate Responsibility in the Workplace and the WorldDue Week 7 and worth 250 points

PharmaCARE (We CARE about YOUR health®) is one of the world’s most successful pharmaceutical companies, enjoying a reputation as a caring, ethical and well-run company that produces high-quality products that save millions of lives and enhance the quality of life for millions of others (Note: PharmaCARE is a hypothetical company that you will to compare to a real company as noted in the assignment criteria below). The company offers free and discounted drugs to low-income consumers, has a foundation that sponsors healthcare educational programs and scholarships, and its CEO serves on the PhRMA board. PharmaCARE recently launched a new initiative, We CARE about YOUR world®, pledging its commitment to the environment through recycling, packaging changes and other green initiatives, despite the fact that the company’s lobbying efforts and PAC have successfully defeated environmental laws and regulations, including extension of the Superfund tax, which was created by Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

Based in New Jersey, PharmaCARE maintains a large manufacturing facility in the African nation of Colberia, where the company has found several “healersâ€Â eager to freely share information about indigenous cures and an abundance of Colberians willing to work for $1.00 a day, harvesting plants by walking five (5) miles into and out of the jungle carrying baskets that, when full, weigh up to fifty (50) pounds. Due to the low standard of living in Colberia, much of the population lives in primitive huts with no electricity or running water. PharmaCARE’s executives, however, live in a luxury compound, complete with a swimming pool, tennis courts, and a golf course. PharmaCARE’s extensive activities in Colberia have destroyed habitat and endangered native species.

In preparation for this assignment, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research companies that have recently experienced negative consequences as a result of the company’s corporate activities. Compare the facts and consequences surrounding the companies you have researched to PharmaCare to support your response(s) to the criteria below.

Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

Describe the key characteristics of a stakeholder and determine all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario.
Analyze the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward.
Assess PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Support the position.
Decide whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories:
Utilitarianism
Deontology
Virtue ethics
Ethics of care
Your own moral / ethical compass
Compare PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Analyze the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Analyze and evaluate laws that protect against discrimination in the workplace.
Examine and assess employee rights to health and safety in the workplace.
Analyze environmental protection laws and assess their impact on organizations.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance.
Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics.

Points: 250

Assignment 3: Ethics and Corporate Responsibility in the Workplace and the World

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Describe the key characteristics of a stakeholder and determine all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely described the key characteristics of a stakeholder, and did not submit or incompletely determined all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario.

Partially described the key characteristics of a stakeholder, and partially determined all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario.

Satisfactorily described the key characteristics of a stakeholder, and satisfactorily determined all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario.

Thoroughly described the key characteristics of a stakeholder, and thoroughly determined all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario.

2. Analyze the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Did not submit or incompletely recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward.

Partially analyzed the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Partially recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward.

Satisfactorily analyzed the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Satisfactorily recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward.

Thoroughly analyzed the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Thoroughly recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward.

3. Assess PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Support the position.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely assessed PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Did not submit or incompletely supported the position.

Partially assessed PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Partially supported the position.

Satisfactorily assessed PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Satisfactorily supported the position.

Thoroughly assessed PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Thoroughly supported the position.

4. Decide whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories:

a. Utilitarianism

b. Deontology

c. Virtue ethics

d. Ethics of care

e. Your own moral / ethical compass

Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely decided whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories:

a. Utilitarianism

b. Deontology

c. Virtue ethics

d. Ethics of care

e. Your own moral / ethical compass

Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially decided whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories:

a. Utilitarianism

b. Deontology

c. Virtue ethics

d. Ethics of care

e. Your own moral / ethical compass

Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily decided whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories:

a. Utilitarianism

b. Deontology

c. Virtue ethics

d. Ethics of care

e. Your own moral / ethical compass

Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly decided whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories:

a. Utilitarianism

b. Deontology

c. Virtue ethics

d. Ethics of care

e. Your own moral / ethical compass

Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

5. Compare PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Analyze the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose.  Â

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely compared PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose.

Partially compared PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Partially analyzed the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose.

Satisfactorily compared PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Satisfactorily analyzed the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose.

Thoroughly compared PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Thoroughly analyzed the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose.

6. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present