01 Jun Constructing a Grading Rubric
Question
Week 3: Constructing a Grading Rubric
Purpose: In this assignment, the student assumes the role of an educator in the academic or staff development practice setting. In this assignment, the student is given the opportunity to identify a content area; develop a written assignment related to the content area; and design a grading rubric consistent with the assignment.
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3
Total Points Possible: 175 Points
Requirements
Description of the Assignment:
This assignment provides the student with the opportunity to acquire skills related to the creation of a written assignment for a selected content area. The written assignment guidelines include learning objectives as well as required content. After designing the written assignment, the student will design a grading rubric consistent with the developed assignment guidelines. It is important to recall that the MSN student assumes the role of a nurse educator and is developing the assignment along with the grading rubric for learners who are either in the academic or staff development practice setting. When the following NR 523 guidelines mentions “learner”, it refers to the learner who is the focus of the MSN student-identified assignment and rubric.
Criteria for Content
- Identification of content area: In this section the MSN student identifies the content area to be the focus of the proposed written assignment. It includes the following required elements:
- Identify the selected content area for the assignment
- Identify the learner that the assignment is designed for
- Explain the importance of the selected content area to the learner
- Development of assignment outcomes: This section identifies the learner outcomes for the MSN student-developed assignment. It includes the following required elements:
- Identify 4 assignment outcomes/objectives appropriate to the learner and content area
- Identify the level of knowledge stated in each outcome by using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
- Develop two of assignment outcomes/objectives at the evaluating or creating level of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
- Present an action verb that is consistent with the selected Bloom’s Taxonomy level
- Include within each outcome an observable learner behavior that can be measured
- Development of assignment guidelines: This section identifies specific guidelines or instructions for the learner. It includes the following required elements:
- Purpose of the assignment
- Points for the assignment
- Specific instructions to the learner regarding the required content for the assignment
- Specific instructions to the learn regarding the required formatting requirements for the assignment
- Development of grading rubric: The section identifies the grading rubric to be used in order to evaluate the learner’s assignment. It includes the following required elements:
- Identify an grading scale than includes percentages for A, B, C, D, and F
- Development of a grading rubric that identifies learner expectations for each grade level
Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
- Cover page is required
- Section headings are required and should be consisting with this assignment requirements
- The required level of knowledge using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy is noted after each assignment outcome/objective in parenthesis.
- A reference list is not needed unless a citation is provided, which is not expected.
- The required grading rubric should consist of the following columns and rows.
Name of the assignment:
| Points for Content: | |||||
| A
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
B
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
C
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
D
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
F
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
|
| Required Criteria #1 | |||||
| Each required criteria has a row | |||||
| Points for Formatting | |||||
| A
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
B
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
C
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
D
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
F
(Descriptive Word) (Grading scale percentage range) |
|
| Required Criteria #1 | |||||
| Each required criteria has a row | |||||
| Total Points Earned: | |||||
Directions and Assignment Criteria
| Assignment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
| Identification of content area | 35 | 20 | Required content for this section includes:
|
| Development of assignment outcomes | 45 | 26 | Required content for this section includes:
|
| Development of assignment guidelines | 40 | 23 | Required content for this section includes:
|
| Development of grading rubric | 45 | 26 | Required content for this section includes:
|
| APA Format (6th edition) | 5 | 3 | Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page (if needed) must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
One deduction for each type of APA style error |
| Writing Mechanics | 5 | 3 | Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. |
| Total | 175 | 100 % |
Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Exceptional
(100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds
(88%) Very good or high level of performance |
Meets
(80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement
(38%) Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing
(0) Unsatisfactory level of performance |
| Content
Possible Points = 165 Points |
|||||
| Identification of content area | 35 Points | 31 Points | 28 Points | 13 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; allelements were present:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements:
|
|
| Development of assignment outcomes | 45 Points | 40 Points | 36 Points | 17 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information in one, two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:
|
|
| Development of assignment guidelines | 40 Points | 35 Points | 32 Points | 15 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; allelements were present:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or moreof the following elements:
|
|
| Development of grading rubric | 45 Points | 40 Points | 36 Points | 17 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory intwo of the following:
|
|
| Content Subtotal ________of 165 points | |||||
| Format
Possible Points = 10 Points |
|||||
| APA Style | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 2 Points | 0 Points |
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
reference page, if needed
One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present |
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
reference page
One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 – 3 APA errors were present |
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
reference page
One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA errors were are present |
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
reference page
One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA errors were present |
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
body of paper (including margins, headings, font, section headings, etc.), and reference page
One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greaterAPA errors were present |
|
| Writing Mechanics | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 2 Points | 0 Points |
| 1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual | 3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual | 5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
|
7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
|
9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
|
|
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.
