Chat with us, powered by LiveChat CRITICALLY DISCUSS AND ADVISE ANDRZEJ, ISABELA, KATARZYNA AND MAREK HOW EU LAW RELATING TO THE FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS (ART 45 TFEU) CAN BE ARGUED TO THE ABOVE EVENTS.? | Writedemy

CRITICALLY DISCUSS AND ADVISE ANDRZEJ, ISABELA, KATARZYNA AND MAREK HOW EU LAW RELATING TO THE FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS (ART 45 TFEU) CAN BE ARGUED TO THE ABOVE EVENTS.?

CRITICALLY DISCUSS AND ADVISE ANDRZEJ, ISABELA, KATARZYNA AND MAREK HOW EU LAW RELATING TO THE FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS (ART 45 TFEU) CAN BE ARGUED TO THE ABOVE EVENTS.?

Critically discuss and advise Andrzej, Isabela, Katarzyna and Marek how EU Law relating to the free movement of persons (Art 45 TFEU) can be argued to the above events.?
Write 1500 words to answer this question. ( Andrzej, a Polish national, recently came to the United Kingdom with his partner Isabela and their two children Katarzyna and Marek. Andrzej obtained a job for a few hours a week where he was paid a salary that was below the minimum wage. He discovered that UK nationals who worked at the factory and who did the same job as him were paid a higher amount and received more holidays than he did. He wished to obtain a social security benefit to top up his income, but was told that, as a non-UK national he did not qualify for this.

Isabela applied for a job as a civil servant. Her application was refused on the ground that this job was open to UK nationals only.
She then applied to be a hotel receptionist. Although she had passed English language exams in Poland she was required to sit for an English language test. She was told that her mark in the test was not high enough so she did not get the job (which was offered to a UK national), although she argued that her English was good enough for this type of work.

Katarzyna is aged 16 and has left school. After coming to the UK, she applied to do a secretarial course at a local college. She had to pay a fee to do the course but later discovered that she was charged a higher fee than UK nationals who had done the same course as her.

Marek was aged 18 and applied to a UK university in Scotland therefore would be living away from his family. He applied for a loan and other financial support while he undertook his course, but he was told that as a non UK national he did not qualify for this.

Andrzej applied for a family rail card. This was refused on the ground that the family had not been resident in the UK for five years.

The family have now encountered some difficulties with the UK authorities. To supplement his income, Andrzej had been selling counterfeit goods. He was convicted of fraud and sent to prison for three months.

Isabela was convicted and fined for shoplifting. Katarzyna was caught using illegal drugs at college and was cautioned. Marek went on a march with some of his fellow students in Scotland. The march turned violent and Marek was arrested for unruly behaviour.

The UK authorities have now decided that the whole family should have their UK residence terminated and be deported.) start the essay with the Law, Directives and Articles that are relevant to the problem, deal with each person in the question separately supporting your argument with as many as relevant cases, argue the cases in relation to the problem. Also which Treaty Article(s) and secondary legislation are relevant to the question.

As Treaty Articles and secondary legislation tend to be general it is the case law that has applied them therefore discussion of what the cases have said is very important. Identify all of the legal issues raised by the problem (this is usually the opening paragraph.

(2) Then discuss each issue in the order in which it occurs. Discuss the law relating to it, argue how it could be applied to the question, and then cover each issue in the same way.

(3) Argue the different possibilities as to how the law could be applied to the situation
Conclude your assay.
Sources: A bibliography must be given at the end and any other sources acknowledged. References should be given at the bottom of each page as footnotes.
SOURCES / READING LIST

1 Steiner & Woods, “EU Law”, 11th Edition, 2012, chapters (check contents).

2 Craig & De Burca,”EC Law: Text,Cases,& Materials”,5th edition, (check content for relevant chapters).

3 Wyatt & Dashwood,”European Community Law”,chapters (check contents).

4 Weatherill,S,”Cases and Materials on EU Law”, chapters (check contents)

5 A Kaczorowska, “European Union Law”, 1st Edition 2009, Cavendish

6 Green,Hartley and Usher,”The Legal Foundations of the Single
European Market”.

7 Ward “A Critical Introduction to European Law”,3rd Edition,2009,Cambridge.
RECENT JOURNAL ARTICLES : 1 Who funds the mobile student? Shedding some light on the normative
assumptions underlying EU free movement law: Commission v. Netherlands
Case C-542/09, European Commission v. Kingdom of the Netherlands,
Judgment of the Court of Justice (Second Chamber) of 14 June 2012, nyr.
(Common Market Law Review 50: 203–216, 2013).
2 Skovgaard-Petersen H, “There and back again: portability of student loans, grants and fee support in a free movement perspective”
(European.Law Review 2013, 38(6), 783-804)
3 Reynolds S, “Exploring the “intrinsic connection” between free movement and the genuine enjoyment test: reflections on EU citizenship after Iida”
(European Law Review, 2013, 38(3), 376-392)

4 O’Brien c, Case C-310/08 London Borough of Harrow v. Nimco Hassan Ibrahim and Secretary of State for the Home Department, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 February 2010, and

Case C-480/08 Maria Teixeira v. London Borough of Lambeth and Secretary
of State for the Home Department, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of
23 February 2010
(Common Market Law Review 48 203–225, 2011)

5 Currie S, “Accelerated justice or a step too far? Residence rights of non-EU family members and the court’s ruling in Metock”
(European Law Review 2009, 34(2), 310-326)

6 Costello C, “Metock: Free Movement and Normal Family Life in the Union”
(Common Market Law Review 46: 587-662, 2009)

7 O’Brien C, “Social Blind Spots and Monocular Policy Making: The ECJ’s Migrant Worker Model”
(Common Market Law Review 46: 1107-1141, 2009)

8 O’Leary S, “Equal treatment and EU citizens: A new chapter on cross-border educational mobility and access to student financial assistance”

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

About Writedemy

We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.

How It Works

To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Are there Discounts?

All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.

Hire a tutor today CLICK HERE to make your first order