25 Jun Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem
Question
Question 1
Define the Problem/Observation: Ed’s grass is dead.
Select one:
a. 4 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
b. 3 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
c. 2 – Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
d. 1 – Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement or related contextual factors.
Question 2
Propose Solutions/ Hypothesis: He does not water the grass.
Select one:
a. 4 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate a deep comprehension of the problem. Solution/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as all of the following ethical, logical, and cultural dimensions of the problem.
b. 3 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate comprehension of the problem. Solutions/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as the one of the following ethical, logical, or cultural dimensions of the problems.
c. 2 – Proposes one solution/hypothesis that is “off the shelf” rather that individually designed to address the specific contextual factors of the problem.
d. 1 – Proposes a solution/hypothesis that is difficult to evaluate because it is vague or only indirectly addresses the problem statement.
Question 3
Evaluate Potential Solutions/Prediction: If he waters, the grass it will grow.
Select one:
a. 4 – Evaluation of solutions is deep and elegant (for example, contains thorough and insightful explanation) and includes, deeply and thoroughly, all of the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
b. 3 – Evaluation of solutions is adequate (for example, contains thorough explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning.
c. 2 – Evaluation of solutions is brief (for example, explanation lacks depth) and includes the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
d. 1 – Evaluation of solutions is superficial (for example, contains cursory, surface level explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
Question 4
Identify Strategies/Set up Experiment: Water Ed’s grass consistently.
Select one:
a. 4 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses thoroughly and deeply multiple contextual factors of the problem.
b. 3 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses multiple contextual factors of the problem in a surface manner.
c. 2 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses the problem statement but ignores relevant contextual factors.
d. 1 – Implements the solution in a manner that does not directly address the problem statement.
Question 5
Observation: Sally has short hair.
Select one:
a. 4 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
b. 3 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
c. 2 – Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
d. 1 – Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement or related contextual factors.
Question 6
Propose Solutions/ Hypothesis: Sally cuts her hair.
Select one:
a. 4 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate a deep comprehension of the problem. Solution/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as all of the following ethical, logical, and cultural dimensions of the problem.
b. 3 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate comprehension of the problem. Solutions/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as the one of the following ethical, logical, or cultural dimensions of the problems.
c. 2 – Proposes one solution/hypothesis that is “off the shelf” rather that individually designed to address the specific contextual factors of the problem.
d. 1 – Proposes a solution/hypothesis that is difficult to evaluate because it is vague or only indirectly addresses the problem statement.
Question 7
Prediction: If she stops cutting her hair, it will grow.
Select one:
a. 4 – Evaluation of solutions is deep and elegant (for example, contains thorough and insightful explanation) and includes, deeply and thoroughly, all of the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
b. 3 – Evaluation of solutions is adequate (for example, contains thorough explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning.
c. 2 – Evaluation of solutions is brief (for example, explanation lacks depth) and includes the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
d. 1 – Evaluation of solutions is superficial (for example, contains cursory, surface level explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
Question. 8:
Identify Strategies/Set up Experiment: Stop cutting Sally’s hair.
Select one:
a. 4 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses thoroughly and deeply multiple contextual factors of the problem.
b. 3 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses multiple contextual factors of the problem in a surface manner.
c. 2 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses the problem statement but ignores relevant contextual factors.
d. 1 – Implements the solution in a manner that does not directly address the problem statement.
Question 9
Define the Problem/Observation: Milk left out on counter by accident for two days spoiled before date.
Select one:
a. 4 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
b. 3 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
c. 2 – Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
d. 1 – Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement or related contextual factors.
Question 10
Propose Solutions/ Hypothesis: Temperature determines the rate of spoiling.
Select one:
a. 4 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate a deep comprehension of the problem. Solution/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as all of the following ethical, logical, and cultural dimensions of the problem.
b. 3 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate comprehension of the problem. Solutions/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as the one of the following ethical, logical, or cultural dimensions of the problems.
c. 2 – Proposes one solution/hypothesis that is “off the shelf” rather that individually designed to address the specific contextual factors of the problem.
d. 1 – Proposes a solution/hypothesis that is difficult to evaluate because it is vague or only indirectly addresses the problem statement.
Question 11
Evaluate Potential Solutions/Prediction: If milk is left at room temperature, it will spoil faster than milk in the refrigerator.
Select one:
a. 4 – Evaluation of solutions is deep and elegant (for example, contains thorough and insightful explanation) and includes, deeply and thoroughly, all of the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
b. 3 – Evaluation of solutions is adequate (for example, contains thorough explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning.
c. 2 – Evaluation of solutions is brief (for example, explanation lacks depth) and includes the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
d. 1 – Evaluation of solutions is superficial (for example, contains cursory, surface level explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
Question 12
Identify Strategies/Set up Experiment: One glass of milk on the counter and one glass in refrigerator. Check daily.
Select one:
a. 4 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses thoroughly and deeply multiple contextual factors of the problem.
b. 3 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses multiple contextual factors of the problem in a surface manner.
c. 2 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses the problem statement but ignores relevant contextual factors.
d. 1 – Implements the solution in a manner that does not directly address the problem statement.
Question 13
Define the Problem/Observation: Simple organisms like cockroaches produce more carbon dioxide under high temperature than in cold temperature.
Select one:
a. 4 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
b. 3 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
c. 2 – Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
d. 1 – Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement or related contextual factors.
Question 14
Propose Solutions/ Hypothesis: The rate of carbon dioxide production by simple living organisms is not affected by external environment temperature.
Select one:
a. 4 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate a deep comprehension of the problem. Solution/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as all of the following ethical, logical, and cultural dimensions of the problem.
b. 3 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate comprehension of the problem. Solutions/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as the one of the following ethical, logical, or cultural dimensions of the problems.
c. 2 – Proposes one solution/hypothesis that is “off the shelf” rather that individually designed to address the specific contextual factors of the problem.
d. 1 – Proposes a solution/hypothesis that is difficult to evaluate because it is vague or only indirectly addresses the problem statement.
Question 15
Evaluate Potential Solutions/Prediction: If you place a number of cockroaches under different temperatures, the cockroaches in a higher temperature will breathe faster, thus producing more carbon dioxide in a short period.
Select one:
a. 4 – Evaluation of solutions is deep and elegant (for example, contains thorough and insightful explanation) and includes, deeply and thoroughly, all of the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
b. 3 – Evaluation of solutions is adequate (for example, contains thorough explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning.
c. 2 – Evaluation of solutions is brief (for example, explanation lacks depth) and includes the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
d. 1 – Evaluation of solutions is superficial (for example, contains cursory, surface level explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
Question 16
Identify Strategies/Set up Experiment: Place an equal weight of cockroaches in two different respirometers under different temperatures and observe what happens in terms of carbon dioxide production.
Select one:
a. 4 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses thoroughly and deeply multiple contextual factors of the problem.
b. 3 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses multiple contextual factors of the problem in a surface manner.
c. 2 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses the problem statement but ignores relevant contextual factors.
d. 1 – Implements the solution in a manner that does not directly address the problem statement.
Question 17
Define the Problem/Observation: Drying a small load of wet clothes takes a long time.
Select one:
a. 4 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
b. 3 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
c. 2 – Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
d. 1 – Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement or related contextual factors.
Question 18
Propose Solutions/ Hypothesis: By adding a dry towel to a small load of wet laundry, the clothes dry faster.
Select one:
a. 4 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate a deep comprehension of the problem. Solution/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as all of the following ethical, logical, and cultural dimensions of the problem.
b. 3 – Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate comprehension of the problem. Solutions/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as the one of the following ethical, logical, or cultural dimensions of the problems.
c. 2 – Proposes one solution/hypothesis that is “off the shelf” rather that individually designed to address the specific contextual factors of the problem.
d. 1 – Proposes a solution/hypothesis that is difficult to evaluate because it is vague or only indirectly addresses the problem statement.
Question 19
Evaluate Potential Solutions/Prediction: When a dry towel is added to a wet load of laundry, the laundry will dry faster.
Select one:
a. 4 – Evaluation of solutions is deep and elegant (for example, contains thorough and insightful explanation) and includes, deeply and thoroughly, all of the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
b. 3 – Evaluation of solutions is adequate (for example, contains thorough explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning.
c. 2 – Evaluation of solutions is brief (for example, explanation lacks depth) and includes the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
d. 1 – Evaluation of solutions is superficial (for example, contains cursory, surface level explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution.
Question 20
Identify Strategies/Set up Experiment:
Independent Variable: Dry towel in wet clothes.
Dependent Variable: Amount of time.
Constant: Towel. Dryer.
Control: Using no towel.
Select one:
a. 4 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses thoroughly and deeply multiple contextual factors of the problem.
b. 3 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses multiple contextual factors of the problem in a surface manner.
c. 2 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses the problem statement but ignores relevant contextual factors.
d. 1 – Implements the solution in a manner that does not directly address the problem statement.
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.