30 Jun EVALUATING UNILEVER SOURCES OF FUNDS
Evaluating Unilever sources of funds
Introduction
Unilever started its journey in the year 1890 when its founder, Hesketh Lever began his revolutionary ideas on cleanliness and discovered the Sunlight Soap brand to popularize hygiene in the Victorian town in England. It was a way of promoting good health and a major contribution to personal attractiveness and as a way of marketing his new discovery or product.
Unilever founding companies began manufacturing products made from fats and oils, basically margarine and soap products between the years 1900 and 1909. Unilever currently has over four hundred brands which range from food items to affordable household cleaning products.
The capital structure of a firm refers to the different combination of how a company finances its assets by combining equity or debts or a hybrid of the two or by a combination of securities. The capital structure of Unilever is based on external financing. The proportion of a companys long-term and short-term debts determines its capital structure. Also its dividend policy. John Linters model (Myers, 1984) indicates that the market stock prices generally responds to unanticipated moves on dividend changes an observation that Miller and Modigliani also noted in 1961. Changes in capital structure relay different messages to investors. (Miller and Modigliani, 1961) Most of the theories relate to optimal capital structure. The static trade of is a framework where a company targets a debt to value ratio that it gradually moves towards it and also adjusts its dividends in the same way towards the payout ratio. The pecking order policy framework prefers the internal financing to external financing and also prefers debt to equity if it deals in securities like the Unilever. The companys optimal debt ratio as the stated Static Tradeoff Theory is determined by a tradeoff between costs and the benefits of holding a companys assets, borrowing and investment decisions. A company is supposed to balance and substitute its debt for equity or its equity for debt for some time until the companys value is maximized. (Peavler, 2012)
The corrected and new version of MM theory on debt and taxes indicate that any tax paying company gains by borrowing; the more the marginal rate of tax the more the pain. (Miller, 1977) However if a company is paying a lower at a lower rate, it would incur a net loss and instead it should lend at a higher rate in order to gain. (Myers, 1984)
Unilever major sources of funds are mostly from external financing. These were repaid by interests which were very high. (Jalilvand and Harris, 1984)
Analyzing Unilevers Debt
Debt ratios indicate the how much the company is depending on debt capital to finance its expansion strategies and operations. The uses of debt capital to fund a firms expansion or acquisitions are beneficial to the firm as they attract some tax advantages. (Welsh, 1996)
Leverage ratios
Debt to Equity = Total debt/ Total Equity. It shows the companys level of leverage and its reliability on external financing. 30450/15716 = 1.94 and 32591/14921 = 2.2 for the years 2012 and 2011 respectively for Unilever. (Harvey, 1995)
Debt to Assets ratio = Total debt / Total assets = 30450/46166 = 0.65. The total debts is 65% of the value of the total assets in 2012 and for the year 2011 was 32591/47512 = 0.69 which is 69%.
In 2010, the Debts to equity ratio was = 26089/41167 = 0.63 which is 63%. (Barges, 1982)
Unilever depends on external financing to finance its operations and acquisitions strategies.
Unilever Balance Sheet for the years 2012 2010
2012 2011 2010
Goodwill and intangible assets 21718 21913 18278
Other non-current assets 12301 11308 10405
Current assets 12147 14291 12484
Total assets 46166 47512 41167
Current liabilities 15815 17929 13606
Noncurrent liabilities 14635 14662 12483
Total liabilities 30450 32591 26089
Shareholders equity 15159 14293 14485
Non controlling interest 557 628 593
Total equity 15716 14921 15078
Total liabilities and equity 46166 47512 41167
Unilever Cash flow for the year 2012 2010 (Million pounds)
2012 2011 2010
Net increase/decrease in cash and cash Equivalent 6836 5452 5490
Net cash flow Investing activities -755 -4467 -1164
Net cash flow Financing activities -6622 411 -4609
Net increase/decrease in cash and cash Equivalent -541 1396 -283
Cash and cash equivalents as at 1 January 2978 1966 2397
Effect of foreign Ex rate changes -220 -384 -148
Cash and cash equivalents as at 31 December 2217 2978 1966
Unilevers financing in the year 2012 increased to €6622 from the previous €411 in 2011 while in the year 2010 it was €4609. This represented an increase of about 1511% from the year 2011.
Performance Indicators
2012 2011 2010
Sales growth 6.90% 6.50% 4.10%
Volume growth 3.40% 1.60% 5.80%
Core operating margin 13.80% 13.50% 13.60%
Free cash flow 4333 3075 3365
The capital structure of Unilever for the year 2012 was made up of the following:
.
Unilever Contractual obligations as at 31 December 2012
Total Due within Due 1-3yrs Due 3-5yrs Due over
1 year 5 years
Long term debt 9920 2539 2521 2976 2784
interest financial liabilities 2839 341 515 380 1603
operating lease obligation 1947 383 588 427 549
Purchase obligation 354 294 37 11 12
Finance leases 350 28 73 46 203
Long term commitment 1889 865 740 221 63
Total 17299 4450 4474 3161 5214
www.unilever.com
Unilever Free cash increased by €1.2 billion to €4.3 billion in 2012 these was due to increased operating profits and improved management in capital structures. The financing costs of Unilever expansion strategy was €390 million in 2012 while in the year 2011 it was €448. The leverage net debt was €8.9 billion in 2012 while in 2011 it was €8.2. The cost of debt was 3.5% and 2.9% on cash deposits. The cost of financing pensions was €7 million while in 2011 it was €71 million. (Damodaran, 2005)
Analyzing Unilevers financial liquidity
Liquid assets are assets that can be quickly converted to cash. The current ratio of Unilever for the year 2012 was 46166/30450 = 1.5 which below the average standard thats 2 i.e. the assets should be twice the total liabilities. In the year 2011 the ratio was 47512/32591 = 1.5. Unilevers debts are higher than the required average.
Unilevers Debts
The optimal debt ratio depends on a firms ability to adjust its equity and debt ratio to achieve a balance that is profitable for its financing activities. (Myers, 1984) A company may decide not to utilize its huge debts if its under levered or to decrease its debt if its over levered.(DeAngelo, and Masulis, 1980) Unilever risks of its dependence on external debt financing may eventually be unsustainable if the rate of taxes increase in future or if the interest rates increase.
References
Barges, A., (1982) The Effect of Capital Structure on the Cost of Capital, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood
Damodaran, A. (2005). Finding the right financing mix: The capital structure decision. Retrieved May 2012 from https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/cfovhds/capstr.pdf
DeAngelo, H., and R. Masulis, (1980) “Optimal Capital Structure Under Corporate and Personal Taxation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 8 3-29.
Harvey, C. (1995). The capital structure and payout policy, WWWFinance. Retrieved May 2013 from https://www.duke.edu/~charvey/Classes/ba350/capstruc/capstruc.htm
Jalilvand, A. and R. S. Harris, (1984) ”Corporate Behavior in Adjusting Capital and Dividend Policy: An Econometric Study,” Journal of Finance, 39 127-145.
Miller, M., (1977) “Debt and Taxes,” Journal of Finance, 32 261-275.
Miller, M., and F. Modigliani, (1961) “Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares,” Journal of Business, 34,411-433
Myers, S.C. (1984) The Capital Structure Puzzle, The Journal of Finance, July 1984, Vol. XXXIX, No 3.
Myers, S. (1984)”The Search for Optimal Capital Structure,” Midland Corporate Finance Journal, 1592 The Journal of Finance
Peavler, R. (2012). Debt and equity financing. Retrieved May 2012 from https://bizfinance.about.com/od/generalinformatio1/a/debtequityfin.htm
Welsh, I., (1996). A primer on capital structure. The John E. Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved May 2013 from httpss://cdad.trident.edu/Presentation.aspx?course=56&term=92&presentation=143
www.unilever,com
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.