for Ray Writer

Running head: HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY ! 1

Healthcare Issue Policy

Raha Albeshr

January,4,2017

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 2

Healthcare Issue Policy

Policy History: Provide some background on the health issue you are researching. What

aspects of earlier debates (key arguments, rhetoric, etc.) have shaped current

controversies on this topic?

The United States currently has many healthcare issues that it is facing. These issues

are the main reason why a large number of people in the country face a lot of health

problems. The country is currently spending the largest amount of money on healthcare

compared to other countries. Due to this reason, many people have provided proposals for

policies that can be utilized to solve these health issues and help individuals in the country

attain a healthcare improvement. An example of the many issues that the country is facing

among others includes shortage of doctors, substance abuse, tobacco, overweight, and

obesity. Access to healthcare is a major issue that many individuals in the United States feel

the need to ensure its existence.

Many people in the United States are interested in the issue of access to healthcare.

Without good access, people do not have the ability to ensure that they will remain healthy.

Access to health care is thus a significantly important aspect that people are highly concerned

with. The patient protection and the affordable care act is one of the main policy that has

attempted to address this issue. Through this act, many individuals have managed to attain

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 3

access to healthcare. A large number of individuals who were initially uninsured have

currently managed to attain access to healthcare provision. This is due to the fact that the

affordable care act has made access to health care significantly cheap and thus those without

the ability to pay high for them to access healthcare provision have managed to attain cheap

options that they can take and thus attain access. The government, through the act, has also

established programs that both cater for the poor, the old and the disabled individuals

ensuring that they are fully covered for health under the government’s cost (Sederstrom,

2014).

Despite these changes and governmental efforts to ensure access to healthcare for all

individuals within the united states, Healthcare access is still a significant problem in the

united states. There are still a number of people who do not have access and at the same time,

a large number of people still question the efficiency of the policy. With the changes that the

care provision act introduced by president Obama established, many people attained access to

healthcare provision, an aspect that resulted in a high demand for highly qualified health care

providers like doctors and physicians. The doctors in the country are thus not sufficient and

thus access to health care for many people in the country resulted in many people within the

country receiving poor quality healthcare provision. The main issue in this case, therefore, is

the fact that the access to healthcare is not completely inclusive despite the establishment of

the affordable care act and has many other methods through which people and policy makers

explain would be beneficial in increasing access. A good example of such a policy argument

is changing the scope of practice laws, which limit the ability of healthcare practitioners to

provide care to the limit of their abilities.

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 4

Two Sides: What are the two opposing positions in the contemporary debate and who

are the key proponents of each? Describe what each side proposes is the problem and

how they intend to solve it, then relate what you know about who the claims-makers are

(the advocates of each side) and what stake they have in the outcomes.

The argument concerning the issue of changing practice laws has both supporters to

this claim and the individuals who do not support the claim. People who support the claim

explain that healthcare providing practitioners have significantly important and beneficial

skills that they can utilize to fully help individuals overcome their health challenges. The

ability of these individuals to utilize their skills in the same is however limited by many

practice laws, which state that they can only provide certain services and despite their high

training and ability, these individuals are denied the chance to continue with their practice.

This aspect takes place when the country is currently in a large shortage of healthcare highly

qualified practitioners like doctors and thus many individuals are forced to wait for a long

time to receive the services of the only qualified and permitted practitioners when the freely

available practitioners like nurses could have effectively addressed their requirements and

health needs. This side of the argument, therefore, explain that it is highly appropriate for the

laws that limit the ability of the individuals within the health providing facilities to be

changed so that they can allow all practitioners to provide services to the levels of their

training limit. This would significantly increase the number of individuals within an

organization who can help patients and thus access to many individuals would be enabled

(Wood, 2011).

There are however a group of individuals who are significantly against this policy

argument. These individuals explain that the current laws that govern practices have been

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 5

established for many reasons, which involves the provision of quality care to every patient.

They explain that the changing of these laws would increase both access and inefficiency in

the field of health care and that it would be appropriate for people to wait until their cases are

handled by highly qualified individuals than to have their cases addressed first by people who

are not considered qualified. Instead of this solution, therefore, these individuals propose that

the most appropriate solution is the increase of medical training facilities and encouragement

of the young individuals in the high learning institutions to take courses that relate to health

care provision careers. This reason, therefore, is a major cause of the opposing views of the

individuals providing significant explanations concerning this issue, and the most appropriate

steps that should be taken to fully address it.

In what ways do these policy positions reflect an individual vs a social factors model of

disease or approach to health care? Is there a moral dimension to the debate?

The two arguments concerning access to healthcare have support from people in the

United States. A large number of them support the argument that changing laws for practice

within the United States would address the access problem in the United States. Another

group of individuals on the other hand supports the claim that changing the laws would

significantly diminish quality provision of healthcare and thus they support the policy of

increasing the number of institutions offering healthcare provision courses to students in the

higher learning institutions of the country and at the same time the provision of

encouragement strategies where those students would be encouraged to study those courses.

These policy positions reflect people’s social perspectives and individual

personalities. A group of people exists who mainly view the negative possibilities of aspects

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 6

in the United States. These people in many cases oppose the majority of the issues that do not

affect them, whether they are correct or wrong. The majority of such individuals are in the

group that is currently claiming that lowering the restrictions established by the practice laws

would reduce the efficiency of healthcare provision. This is because many of the individuals

who involve in the provision of healthcare activities do not fully utilize the skills that they

had been taught in their training sessions. The majority of these skills are out into waste,

mainly because the practice restricting laws mainly prohibit the from using them on patients.

The united states, therefore, face challenges and remain without addressing them, when these

challenges have a solution that could simply be established by changing some of its current

operating law (States in Action, 2010).

A major problem exists within the country due to the people who offer support to

others and policies without any specific reason for the support. This group of people decides

to offer support to policies through political; basis and not their views and perspectives

concerning the same. These individuals would support a policy argument without even

having to listen and understand the claims of the argument, simply because a certain

individual who they support politically is also supporting the argument. With regard to this

policy, a number of individuals also support the policy arguments basing from the individuals

that support them. The debate also has a moral dimension. The individuals who support

arguments since they believe they are the most appropriate and should be established are

morally right and should have their understanding taken into account when the appropriate

approach concerning the policy is being taken. The individuals who offer the support of an

argument without considering its provision, on the other hand, are not morally correct,

mainly because they offer support to an argument they have not considered and thus are not

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 7

aware of the effect that the policy established by the argument would have both to them and

others.

How do social conditions play a role in understanding these policy positions? Is there an

issue with access to appropriate resources, and, if so, what would they be in this

particular case? Are there “upstream” factors that divide the positions, or are they

ignored by both sides? If the latter, give an example of what is missing from the debate.

Social conditions refer to the situations through which individuals have in the society

due to their ethnicity, income, education and occupation among other factors. These

conditions significantly affect the perspectives of individuals and their concerns with regard

to many policies that are proposed. An individual with a significantly low income, for

example, would have a significant concern to policy arguments that would make a difference

with his or her affordability of certain goods or services and at the same time improve his or

her income. At the same time, an individual with a high income would have a different

perspective, mainly because he or she is aware that making certain goods and services cheap

would not make any significant difference.

Access to healthcare is a condition that all people in the society can attain. Both the

rich and the poor people in the society are affected by the condition. The poor people in the

society lack the ability to access healthcare because they rely fully on the single option that

they can afford within the affordable care act provision. These individuals do not have the

ability look for other sources of care provision mainly because they are not able to pay for

them. Some other individuals at the same time do not have any way through which they can

access healthcare. The lack of healthcare providers causes a high demand for healthcare

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 8

provision and thus results in an increase in healthcare provision cost. The increase in cost

results in a certain group of low-income earners being unable to attain access to healthcare

provision.

Although the problem of access also affects the high-income earners, these

individuals have the ability to outsource healthcare services from other options apart from the

provisions of the affordable care act. This implies that the problem of access does not affect

them significantly in the same way that it affects the low-income earners. The ability of the

high-income earners to access healthcare services from other places mainly because they

have the ability to pay for them and the inability of the poor individuals to access such care

thus affects the views and perspective of people with regard to this policy proposition. People

with the ability to outsource healthcare services have their main aim being the quality of care

that is provided to them. Due to this reason, therefore, they support the solution of increasing

medical courses in schools and encouraging students in order to increase the number of

qualified healthcare providing personnel in future. They have the understanding that

currently, they would still attain access from different sources since they have the ability to

pay for them. Low-income earners, on the other hand, have a different perspective (Enomoto,

2016).

Are there disparities among different social groups in regards to this issue (e.g.,

different disease rates, differential access to treatments or facilities, different

experiences of disease progression, etc.)? Do these disparities figure into the current

debate? If not, why not?

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 9

As explained, major disparities exist within the existing social groups. The main

social groups are divided by the difference in earning that people in the society attain. The

individuals who attain high earnings have the ability to guarantee their access to health care

unlike the individuals living under low earnings. This fact causes their opinions and support

concerning the healthcare access policy arguments significantly different. The lowly earning

individuals support the argument that practice laws that limit highly skilled healthcare

providing individuals like nurses to provide health care to patients up to the level of their

limits to be changed allowing them to provide more of the skills that they have attained. On

the other hand, the highly earning individuals support the establishment of the policy

argument that the most appropriate solution to access of healthcare is increasing the number

of higher learning institutions that offer healthcare provision courses. The argument also

includes the increase in the number of individuals willing to take those courses and thus

manage to increase the number of qualified healthcare providing individuals in future.

The lowly earning individuals support this argument of the policy because the cost is

a major concern in their access to healthcare. They are not able to access healthcare from

other sources apart from the provision of the affordable care act that they manage to afford.

When the healthcare providing individuals are thus limited and they are required to wait for a

long time for them to be provided with healthcare, these individuals do not have the funds to

pay for other outsourced sources of care. The individuals, therefore, views the change of laws

to allow the other restricted but skilled practitioners to also contribute by offering their skills

to the maximum levels. The individuals understand that by changing these laws, many

individuals would thus involve in the practice of providing care and thus the problem of

delays to access healthcare, which is significantly important, would be reduced significantly.

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 10

The rich individuals, on the other hand, support the argument of increasing the

number of qualified practitioners in the healthcare provision system through the increase of

courses in schools and encouragement strategies because, to begin with, quality is a major

concern compared to the individuals who are not able to access healthcare similarly. The

second main reason is because the individuals have the ability to use other methods in

accessing healthcare apart from the provided options by the healthcare affordable care act,

mainly because they have the ability to pay for the services offered. This implies that the

individuals, therefore, do not have problems waiting for years until the individuals from

schools complete their studies to cause the desired changes. These two main disparities,

therefore, makes a significant contribution to the debate concerning this policy.

Annotated Bibliography

The research concerning this issue is obtained from many literal sources, which

provide sufficient information concerning the topic. This section provides information

concerning each source and the reason why it was beneficial to the research of the topic.

States in Action, (2010). State and Federal Efforts to Enhance Access to Basic Health Care:

States in Action Archive. Retrieved from http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/

newsletters/states-in-action/2010/mar/march-april-2010/feature/feature

This source provides information concerning the current methods that different states

in the country are utilizing to increase healthcare and the challenges that these methods face.

Information from this source is important because it explains the current problems that the

states are facing with regard to access to healthcare and the current methods that the states are

attempting to utilize in order to change the condition. Access to healthcare is important and

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 11

thus almost all states have established plans to enhance the same. Some of these plans have

failed and others have succeeded. Information from this source can thus be utilized to

determine whether the arguments of the access policy are appropriate or not.

Sederstrom, J. (2014). 7 ways to improve access: Modern Medicine Network. Retrieved from

http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/managed-healthcare-executive/

content/tags/access-care/7-ways-improve-access

This article provides information concerning the methods that different states have

decided to establish through which they intend to increase healthcare access to the individuals

within them. The authors explain certain methods and proposals to policy makers through

which healthcare access can be improved and enhanced within the states and even the nation

at large. Amount the many methods that the authors explain is the method of changing

restriction laws which is explained in detail within this paper. The authors also provide an

explanation of the many individuals that intend to have the other policies that are education

based replacing this policy.

Enomoto, K. (2016). Improving Access to Mental Health Services: HHS Gov. Retrieved from

https://www.hhs.gov/blog/2016/02/09/improving-access-mental-health-services.html

This source provide information concerning the ability of different but already

established programs in the united states have managed to affect the ability of the united

states to increase and improve healthcare access. The author to the source explain about a

large number of programs that are currently in place, which aid the ability of the country and

individual states to extend healthcare access to the individuals that are not able to attain

access. The information provided by this source is important because through it the paper

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 12

manages to explain the basis that different groups supporting different arguments base their

arguments.

Wood, R. (2011). Reducing Costs and Improving the Quality of Health Care: Robert Wood

Foundation. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2iEuPLL

This source provides information concerning the means through which the quality of

healthcare can be improved with reduced costs being also in place. The author to the source

provides many ways through which people are able to increase the number of sources and at

the same time manage to reduce the cost. The source explains the aspect of ensuring that all

practitioners are allowed to operate to the levels only limited by their skills and thus supports

one of the argument claims that the change of the restriction laws is one of the main methods

through which access to healthcare provision can be enhanced.

References

HEALTHCARE ISSUE POLICY 13

Enomoto, K. (2016). Improving Access to Mental Health Services: HHS Gov. Retrieved from

https://www.hhs.gov/blog/2016/02/09/improving-access-mental-health-services.html

Sederstrom, J. (2014). 7 ways to improve access: Modern Medicine Network. Retrieved from

http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/managed-healthcare-

executive/content/tags/access-care/7-ways-improve-access

States in Action, (2010). State and Federal Efforts to Enhance Access to Basic Health Care:

States in Action Archive. Retrieved from http://www.commonwealthfund.org/

publications/newsletters/states-in-action/2010/mar/march-april-2010/feature/feature

Wood, R. (2011). Reducing Costs and Improving the Quality of Health Care: Robert Wood

Foundation. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2iEuPLL

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.