09 May HOW COULD RISK MANAGEMENT HAVE AIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMET?
The Development of the Comet The de Havilland Aircraft Company of Great Britain had long been respected in the aircraft manufacturing industry for its innovative and high-performance designs. Coming off its excellent work during World War II the company believed that it stood poised on the brink of success in the commercial airframe industry.The de Havilland designers and executives accurately perceived that the next generation of airplane would be jet-powered. Consequently they decreed that their newest commercial air frame tentatively called the Comet would employ jet power and other leading edge technology. Jets offered a number of advantages over propeller-driven airplanes the most obvious of which was speed. Jets could cruise at nearly 450 miles per hour compared with the 300 miles per hour a propeller could generate. For overseas flight in particular this advantage was important. It could reduce the length of long flights from a mind-numbing two to three days to mere hours encouraging more andmore business people and tourists to use airplanes as their primary method for travel. Further jets tended to be quieter than propeller-driven aircraft giving a more comfortable interior sound level and ride to passengers. De Havilland engineers sought to create streamlined airplane that could simultaneously carry up to 50 passengers in comfort while maintaining aerodynamics and high speed. After working with a number of design alternatives the Comet began to take shape. Its design was indeed distinctive: The four jet engines were embedded in pairs in the wing roots at the point where they joined the fuselage. From the front the aircraft looked as though its wings were literally heldin place by the engines. The result of these innovative engineering designs was an aircraft that had remarkable stability in flight was sleek in appearance and was very fast.Another distinctive feature of the aircraft was the pressurized cabin intended to maintain passenger comfort at cruising altitudes of up to 30 000 feet. In its original testing for safety de Havilland engineers had pressurized the airframe to more than five times the recommended air density to ensure that there was a clean seal. Consequently they were confident that the pressurization system would perform well at its lower standardized settings. Finally in an effort to add some flair to the design each window in the passenger cabin was square rather than the small round or oval shapes so commonly used. Knowing that it was facing competition from Boeing Corporation to be first to market with a commercial jet de Havilland’s goal was to introduce its new aircraft as quickly as possible in order to establish the standard for the commercial airline industry. Atfirst it appeared the company had succeeded: BOAC (British Overseas Airways Corporation) ordered several Comets as did Air France and the British military. De Havilland also received some queries from interested American airline companies notably Pan American Airlines. It looked as though de Havilland’s strategy was working; the company was first to market with a radical new design using a number of state-of-the-art technologies. BOAC’s first nine Comet 1 s entered service with the airline on May 2 1952. Thefuture looked bright. Troubles In early May of 1953 a brand new Comet operated by BOAC left Calcutta India and flew off into the afternoon sky. Six minutes later and only 22 miles from Calcutta’s Dum Dum Airport the aircraft exploded and plunged to earth killing all 43 passengers and crew on board. There had been no indication of problemsand no warning from the pilots of technical difficulties. Investigators from Great Britain and India tended to believe the crash came about due to pilot error coupled with weather conditions. Evidence from the wreckage including the tail section seemed to indicate that the aircraft had been struck by something heavy but without any additional information forthcoming both the authorities and de Havilland engineers laid the blame on external causes. January 10 1954 was a mild clear day in Rome as passengers boarded their BOAC aircraft for the final leg of their flight from Singapore to London. When the airplane reached its cruising altitude and speed it disintegrated over the Mediterranean Sea near the island of Elba. Most of the airplane was lost at the bottom of the sea but amid the flotsam 15 bodies of passengers and crew were recovered. A local physician who examined the remains noted: “They showed no look of terror. Death must have come without warning.” As a safety precaution BOAC instituted a ban on the use of Comets until the airplanes had been thoroughly checked over. Technicians could find nothing wrong with the new aircraft and following recertification the airplanes were again brought back into service. Alas it was too soon. On April 8 only 16 days after the Comet was reintroduced into service a third aircraft operated by South African Airways departed from Rome’s Ciampino airport for Cairo one of the legs of its regular flight from London to Johannesburg. Under perfect flying weather the airplane rapidlygained its cruising altitude of 26 000 feet and its airspeed of almost 500 miles an hour. Suddenly the flight radio went silent and failed to answer repeated calls. A search of the ocean off the island of Stromboli Italy turned up an oil slick and some debris. Because of the depth of the water and the time necessary to arrive at the crash site there was little to be found by search crews. Five bodies were all that were recovered this time though with an eerie similarity to the victims of the second disaster: Facial expressions showed no fear as though death had come upon them suddenly. What Went Wrong? Investigators swarmed over the recovered wreckage of the aircraft and reexamined the pieces from the first Calcutta accident while also conducting underwater searches at the sight of the second crash near the island of Elba. Guided by underwater cameras investigators were able to collect sufficient aircraft fragments (in fact they finally recovered nearly 70% of the airframe) to make some startling discoveries. The foremost finding from the recovery of the entire intact tail section was that the fuselage of the aircraft had exploded. Second it appeared that engine failure was not the cause of the accidents. Another finding was equally important: The wings and fuselage showed unmistakable signs of metal fatigue later shown to be the cause of failure in all three aircraft. This point was important because it advanced the theory that the problem was one of structural design rather than simple part failure. Britain’s Civil Aviation Board immediatelygrounded the entire Comet fleet pending extensive reviews and airworthiness certification. For the next five months the CAB set out on an extensive series of tests to isolate the exact causes of the mysterious crashes. Before testing was complete one Comet had been tested literally to destruction another had its fuel tanks ruptured more than 70 complete test flights were made in a third and between 50 and 100 test models were broken up. The results of the extensive tests indicated a number of structural and design flaws. Although the aircraft’s designers were convinced that the structure would remain sound for 10 000 flight hours before requiring major structural overhauling simulations showed unmistakable signs of metal fatigue after the equivalent of only 3 000 flight hours. Experts argued that even when fatigue levels were revised downward to less than 3 000 hours Comets would not be safe beyond 1 000 flying hours a ludicrously low figure in terms of the amount of use a commercial airliner is expected to receive. In addition testing of the fuselage offered disturbing indications of the cause of failure. Specifically cracks began developing in the corners of the cabin windows and these cracks were exacerbated by repeated pressurization and depressurization of the cabin. The investigators noted that this result was most pronounced along the rivet lines near the fuselage windows. Testing also demonstrated that the wings had a low resistance to fatigue. At a number of stages in the tests serious cracks appeared starting at the rivet holes near the wheel wells and finally resulting in rivet heads in the top wing surface actually shearing off. Engineers and investigators were finding incontrovertible evidencein the pieces of recovered wreckage that the cause of the sudden disintegration of the aircraft could only have been due to cabin pressure blowout. Engineers suspected that the critical failure of the aircraft occurred following sudden depressurization when one or more windows were literally blown out of the aircraft. This led to a sudden “gyroscopic moment” as the aircraft nosed down and began its plunge to earth. Although at the time no one would admit it the handwriting was on the wall. After two years in which Comets carried more than 55 000 passengers over 7 million air miles the Comet 1 was never to fly again. De Havilland had indeed won the race to be first to market with a commercial jet—a race that it would have been better to have never run at all.16Questions1. How could risk management have aided in the development of the Comet?2. Discuss the various types of risk (technical financial commercial etc.) in relation to the Comet. Develop a qualitative risk matrix for these risk factors and assess them in terms of probability and consequences.3. Given that a modified version of the Comet (the Comet IV) was used until recently by the British government as an antisubmarine warfare aircraft it is clear that the design flaws could have been corrected given enough time. What then do you see as de Havilland’s critical error in the development of the Comet?4. Comment on this statement: “Failure is the price we pay for technological advancement.”
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.