17 Jun INCLUDE RESULTS OF THE STUDY AND HOW THESE RESULTS ARE APPLICABLE TO YOUR PROJECT.
APA Reference for Article: Merriman, S. (2013). Cardiovascular disease and diet: the way to a healthy heart. Nursing & Residential Care, 15(1), 22-25 4p.
Type of Source:
Is it Research (peer-reviewed article) or Non-research systematic review, clinical practice guidelines, organizational experience, or expert opinion/case study/literature review. Research (peer- reviewed article)
Strength of Research:
Discuss the strength of the sources. Report if evidence is High, Good, or Low/Major Flaw. Use the tools on page 238-244 of your text and discuss the reasons why you have assigned a particular level of quality. The strength of the source is good. The results were clearly stated providing details of the results. Limitations were discussed and provided. The article clearly stated the investigation discussed and included supporting details.
Brief Description of Research:
Address the questions in your summary:
*How does the information in the article apply to the project problem or proposed intervention?
*Summarize in your own words.
* Include results of the study and how these results are applicable to your project.
* What is the recommendation of the source for clinical practice? The information provided in this article applies to the intervention proposed because it directly states reason to follow a healthy diet, how to follow a healthy diet and how it can improve your health.
Article #4
APA Reference for Article:
Type of Source:
Is it Research (peer-reviewed article) or Non-research systematic review, clinical practice guidelines, organizational experience, or expert opinion/case study/literature review.
Strength of Research:
Discuss the strength of the sources. Report if evidence is High, Good, or Low/Major Flaw. Use the tools on page 238-244 of your text and discuss the reasons why you have assigned a particular level of quality.
Brief Description of Research:
Address the questions in your summary:
*How does the information in the article apply to the project problem or proposed intervention?
*Summarize in your own words.
* Include results of the study and how these results are applicable to your project.
* What is the recommendation of the source for clinical practice?
GRADING RUBRIC: PICO
Assignment Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
A (92–100%) Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%) Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
C (76–83%) Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
F (0–75%) Total
PICO question and components
40 points Question or nursing problem is identified and is an independent nursing decision. PICO elements are correctly identified. Outcomes are measurable.
37–40 points Question or nursing problem is identified and is an independent nursing decision. PICO elements are correctly identified. Outcomes but are not measurable.
34–36 points Question or nursing problem is identified and is an independent nursing decision. One PICO element is not correctly identified. Outcomes but are not measurable.
30–33 points Question or nursing problem is identified but is not an independent nursing decision. Several PICO elements are not correctly identified. Outcomes are not measurable or may not be present.
0–29 points 38/40
Practice issue and scope of the problem
20 points *Practice issue/problem is thoroughly described. The need for change is evident. *Practice area is identified. *Identification of the practice issue is clear.
*Scope of the problem is identified.
19–20 points *Practice issue/problem is vaguely described. The need for change is evident.
*Practice area is identified. *Identification of the practice issue is clear.
*Scope of the problem is identified.
17–18 points *Practice issue/problem is vaguely described. The need for change is not obvious.
*Practice area is identified. *Identification of the practice issue is clear.
*Scope of the problem is identified.
15–16 points *Practice issue/problem is vaguely described. Need for change is not obvious.
*Practice issues or scope of the problem are not addressed and/or not accurate.
0–14 points 19/20
Evidence and search terms.
15 points Appropriately identifies the types of evidences that should be gathered (must include literature search). Uses manageable search terms and ways in which the search can be narrowed if discussed.
14–15 points Appropriately identifies the types of evidences that should be gathered (must include literature search). Uses manageable search terms. Ways in which the search can be narrowed is not included.
13 points Appropriately identifies the types of evidences that should be gathered (must include literature search). Search terms are not measurable. Ways in which the search can be narrowed is not included.
11–12 points Types of evidence that should be gathered is not noted or not correct, literature search not identified. Search terms are not measurable or absent. Ways in which the search can be narrowed is not included.
0–10 points 14/15
Total Points 71/75
GRADING RUBRIC: EVIDENCE APPRAISAL
Assignment Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
A (92–100%) Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%) Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
C (76–83%) Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
F (0–75%) Total
Article Selection
30 points Four articles used. At least three articles are peer-reviewed research. Other source is scholarly and appropriate for the change project. Type of source is properly identified. References are listed in APA format.
28–30 points Four articles used. At least three articles are peer-reviewed research. Other source is scholarly and appropriate for the change project. Type of source is not properly identified. References are listed in APA format.
25–27 points Four articles used. At least three articles are peer-reviewed research. Other source is scholarly and appropriate for the change project. Type of source is not properly identified. References some errors in APA format.
23–24 points Less than three articles are peer-reviewed research. Other source is not scholarly or appropriate for the change project. Type of source is not properly identified. References have multiple errors in APA format.
0–22 points 20/30
Only 3 articles provided – skipped the entire last article row
Strength of Research
20 points Strength of the research is listed as High, Good, or Low/Major Flaw. Reasons why the rating was given is clearly discussed and logical.
19–20 points Strength of the research is listed as High, Good, or Low/Major Flaw. Reason why the rating was given is documented but is not logical.
17–18 points Strength of the research is listed as High, Good, or Low/Major Flaw. Reason why the rating was given is vague or absent.
15–16 points Strength of the research is not listed as High, Good, or Low/Major Flaw. Reason why the rating was given is vague or absent.
0–14 points 15/20
Only ¾ completed
Description of Research
50 points Description of the research is thorough and detailed. Summary was given in own words. Results of the study were summarized with the application to the project noted. Recommendations for clinical practice were discussed.
46–50 points Description of the research is thorough and detailed. Summary was given in own words. Results of the study were listed but no application or summary of results were given. Recommendations for clinical practice were discussed.
42–45 points Description of the research is vague. Summary was given in own words. Results of the study were listed but no application or summary of results were given. Recommendations for clinical practice were not discussed.
38–41 points Description of the research is vague. Summary was not in own words but rather quotes from the source. Results of the study may not be listed. Recommendations for clinical practice were not discussed.
0–37 points 35/50
Only ¾ completed. On the 3 provided vague, absence of linkage to PICO, did not address recommendations question
Total Points 70/100
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.