15 Jun Increase access to mental health services
Question
Critical thinking paper
You are an expert in the healthcare field and you have been asked by Governor
McAuliffe to provide your recommendation on one of the following healthcare proposals that would be beneficial for the Commonwealth of Virginia.
The proposal options are to:
1) Increase access to mental health services.
Increase Medicaid Assistance.
Standardize color-coded medical bracelets in all healthcare facilities.
Mandatory completion of an Advance Directive during an acute care admission.
Viability of the Certificate of Public Need
The assignment is to write a 2-3 page position paper in which you present an argument for or against one of the proposals above. Your paper is to be arranged in the following order:
What specific problem is addressed by the proposal?
What are the benefits and drawbacks of this proposal?
What are some other options?
Provide a recommendation. Do you agree with the proposal or not? Why or why not? Try to convince your audience that the proposal is or is not a good idea.
* Before starting the paper, review the grading rubric.
*The paper should be double-spaced and you should use 12 point font.
*Include a good introductory paragraph and a conclusion.
*Include at least 3 reference, using APA referencing guidelines to cite the sources. The text is not to be used a reference.
Name:
Elements
Highly Competent (4)
Exceeds Expectations
Competent (3)
Needs Improvement (2)
Not Competent (1)
Not Done (0)
1. Problem/Position
Thesis statement
& introduction
Clearly identified, explicit.
Adequately identified and
described.
Problem/issue present, but ambiguous.
Problem/issue not present or unclear.
Thesis statement not present
Background
Background sets the stage & is not part of argument.
Background does an adequate job of setting the stage.
Background has some argument points.
Background does not adequately set the stage for the current issue.
Background absent.
2. Analysis
Position or supporting thesis argument
Clearly stated with at least 3 well developed defenses.
Well stated with at least 2 developed defenses.
Vaguely stated with at least 1 limited defense.
Poorly stated with no defense.
Supporting arguments not present.
Opposing argument
Minimum of 3 alternate points of view well explored.
Thoroughly considered attention to minimum of 2 alternate views.
Some attention to at least 1 alternate view.
Obvious alternate views ignored.
Opposing arguments not present.
3. Investigation
Use of Sources materials
All sources relevant, appropriate, credible –(primary or secondary sources).
Most sources relevant, appropriate, credible–(primary or secondary sources).
Some sources are relevant, appropriate, credible –(primary or secondary sources).
Inadequate number of sources; No sources are relevant, appropriate, credible.
Reference page absent.
4. Writing Skills
Organization
Ideas flow smoothly, clearly linked to each other and organized under headings – Introduction, Background, and Argument and Conclusion. Ideas well incorporated into a coherent argument or solution.
Ideas tend to flow smoothly, usually linked to each other and properly organized under headings – Introduction, Background, and Argument and Conclusion. Ideas incorporated into a fairly coherent argument or solution.
Ideas are incomplete, make little sense together, not well organized under headings – Introduction, Background, Argument and Conclusion. Some ideas are used in argument or solution.
Ideas are tangent, makes no sense together. Ideas lack connection or coherence.
Required paper sections absent.
Style
Paragraphs with clear topic sentences and multiple supporting sentences. Variety of sentence structures in active voice. Appropriate, high level word choice.
Paragraphs include topic sentences and some supporting sentences. Generally well chosen sentence style and word choice.
Paragraphs missing clear topic sentences; sparse supporting sentences. Sentence style errors; overuse of passive voice. Word choice errors; low level vocabulary.
Poorly organized paragraphs. Extensive slang, inappropriate language, and low level word choices.
No paragraph segmenta-tion.
Grammar, Mechanics, & Formatting
Use of proper grammar and mechanics throughout Proper use of APA format throughout.
Mostly used proper grammar and mechanics throughout. Adequate use of APA format throughout.
Weak use of proper grammar and mechanics throughout. Weak use of APA Format.
Improper grammar and mechanics throughout. Improper APA throughout.
Paper not in APA format.
5. Conclusion(s)
Synthesis and Conclusions
All points summarized & synthesized/Conclusions based on evidence/sound methods
Some points summarized & synthesized, Most conclusions based on evidence used with adequate methods
Summary points briefly mentioned, weak synthesis
Conclusions drawn & errors presented
No synthesis or summary Conclusions ignored; maintains preconceived views regardless of evidence
Conclusion absent
Total Points /36 /27 /18 /9
**Score used for a measure of critical thinking outcomes and Individual students must obtain a minimum critical thinking score of 21 in order to be considered competent
Paper Grade_______________________ Points Achieved
Comments:
Points/Grade
36 = 100% 21 = 72-73%
35 = 99% 20 = 70-71%
34 = 98% 19 = 68-69%
33 = 97% 18 = 66-67%
32 = 95-96% 17 = 64-65%
31 = 93-94% 16 = 62-63%
30 = 90-92% 15 = 60-61%
29 -89% 14 = 58-59%
28 -87% 13 = 56-57%
27 -85% 12 = 54-55%
26 -83% 11 = 52-53%
25 -81% 10 = 50-51%
24 -79% 09 = 0-49%
23 -77%
22 -75%Question
Critical thinking paper
You are an expert in the healthcare field and you have been asked by Governor
McAuliffe to provide your recommendation on one of the following healthcare proposals that would be beneficial for the Commonwealth of Virginia.
The proposal options are to:
1) Increase access to mental health services.
Increase Medicaid Assistance.
Standardize color-coded medical bracelets in all healthcare facilities.
Mandatory completion of an Advance Directive during an acute care admission.
Viability of the Certificate of Public Need
The assignment is to write a 2-3 page position paper in which you present an argument for or against one of the proposals above. Your paper is to be arranged in the following order:
What specific problem is addressed by the proposal?
What are the benefits and drawbacks of this proposal?
What are some other options?
Provide a recommendation. Do you agree with the proposal or not? Why or why not? Try to convince your audience that the proposal is or is not a good idea.
* Before starting the paper, review the grading rubric.
*The paper should be double-spaced and you should use 12 point font.
*Include a good introductory paragraph and a conclusion.
*Include at least 3 reference, using APA referencing guidelines to cite the sources. The text is not to be used a reference.
Name:
Elements
Highly Competent (4)
Exceeds Expectations
Competent (3)
Needs Improvement (2)
Not Competent (1)
Not Done (0)
1. Problem/Position
Thesis statement
& introduction
Clearly identified, explicit.
Adequately identified and
described.
Problem/issue present, but ambiguous.
Problem/issue not present or unclear.
Thesis statement not present
Background
Background sets the stage & is not part of argument.
Background does an adequate job of setting the stage.
Background has some argument points.
Background does not adequately set the stage for the current issue.
Background absent.
2. Analysis
Position or supporting thesis argument
Clearly stated with at least 3 well developed defenses.
Well stated with at least 2 developed defenses.
Vaguely stated with at least 1 limited defense.
Poorly stated with no defense.
Supporting arguments not present.
Opposing argument
Minimum of 3 alternate points of view well explored.
Thoroughly considered attention to minimum of 2 alternate views.
Some attention to at least 1 alternate view.
Obvious alternate views ignored.
Opposing arguments not present.
3. Investigation
Use of Sources materials
All sources relevant, appropriate, credible –(primary or secondary sources).
Most sources relevant, appropriate, credible–(primary or secondary sources).
Some sources are relevant, appropriate, credible –(primary or secondary sources).
Inadequate number of sources; No sources are relevant, appropriate, credible.
Reference page absent.
4. Writing Skills
Organization
Ideas flow smoothly, clearly linked to each other and organized under headings – Introduction, Background, and Argument and Conclusion. Ideas well incorporated into a coherent argument or solution.
Ideas tend to flow smoothly, usually linked to each other and properly organized under headings – Introduction, Background, and Argument and Conclusion. Ideas incorporated into a fairly coherent argument or solution.
Ideas are incomplete, make little sense together, not well organized under headings – Introduction, Background, Argument and Conclusion. Some ideas are used in argument or solution.
Ideas are tangent, makes no sense together. Ideas lack connection or coherence.
Required paper sections absent.
Style
Paragraphs with clear topic sentences and multiple supporting sentences. Variety of sentence structures in active voice. Appropriate, high level word choice.
Paragraphs include topic sentences and some supporting sentences. Generally well chosen sentence style and word choice.
Paragraphs missing clear topic sentences; sparse supporting sentences. Sentence style errors; overuse of passive voice. Word choice errors; low level vocabulary.
Poorly organized paragraphs. Extensive slang, inappropriate language, and low level word choices.
No paragraph segmenta-tion.
Grammar, Mechanics, & Formatting
Use of proper grammar and mechanics throughout Proper use of APA format throughout.
Mostly used proper grammar and mechanics throughout. Adequate use of APA format throughout.
Weak use of proper grammar and mechanics throughout. Weak use of APA Format.
Improper grammar and mechanics throughout. Improper APA throughout.
Paper not in APA format.
5. Conclusion(s)
Synthesis and Conclusions
All points summarized & synthesized/Conclusions based on evidence/sound methods
Some points summarized & synthesized, Most conclusions based on evidence used with adequate methods
Summary points briefly mentioned, weak synthesis
Conclusions drawn & errors presented
No synthesis or summary Conclusions ignored; maintains preconceived views regardless of evidence
Conclusion absent
Total Points /36 /27 /18 /9
**Score used for a measure of critical thinking outcomes and Individual students must obtain a minimum critical thinking score of 21 in order to be considered competent
Paper Grade_______________________ Points Achieved
Comments:
Points/Grade
36 = 100% 21 = 72-73%
35 = 99% 20 = 70-71%
34 = 98% 19 = 68-69%
33 = 97% 18 = 66-67%
32 = 95-96% 17 = 64-65%
31 = 93-94% 16 = 62-63%
30 = 90-92% 15 = 60-61%
29 -89% 14 = 58-59%
28 -87% 13 = 56-57%
27 -85% 12 = 54-55%
26 -83% 11 = 52-53%
25 -81% 10 = 50-51%
24 -79% 09 = 0-49%
23 -77%
22 -75%
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.