Course Project Milestone 2: Patient Teaching Plan Guidelines
Updated 7/23/2017
Purpose
The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to apply information gathered from the Family Genetic History and Milestone 1 assignments to aid with identifying one modifiable risk factor and develop an evidence-based teaching plan that promotes health as well as improves patient outcomes.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.
CO #4: Identify teaching/learning needs from the health history of an individual. (PO #2)
Points
This assignment is worth a total of 250 points.
Rubric
Click to view and download the NR305 Milestone 2: Patient Teaching Plan Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Directions
Prepare a patient teaching plan for your participant based on the information you discovered in your previous assignments. Present your plan using Microsoft PowerPoint.
Title slide (first slide): Include a title slide with your name and title of the presentation.
Introduction/Identification (two to three slides): Introduce a modifiable risk factor (diet, smoking, activity, etc.) that will be the focus of your presentation.
Identify at least one important finding you discovered in Milestone 1 that is associated with this risk factor.
Explain how this places your adult participant at increased risk for developing a preventable disease (obesity, Type II Diabetes, etc.), which is described.
List short and long-term goals.
Intervention (four to five slides): Choose one evidence-based intervention related to the modifiable risk factor chosen that has been shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the preventable disease.
Describe the intervention in detail.
Provide rationale to support the use of this intervention. Support your rationale with information obtained from one scholarly source as well as Healthy People 2020 ( http://healthypeople.gov (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.). Include any additional resources (websites, handouts, etc.) that you will share with your adult participant, if applicable.
Evaluation (three to four slides): Describe at least one evaluation method that you would use to determine whether your intervention is effective. Outcome measurement is a crucial piece when implementing interventions.
Describe at least one method (weight, lab values, activity logs, etc.) you would use to evaluate whether your intervention was effective.
Describe the desired outcomes you would track that would show whether your intervention is working.
Include additional steps to be considered if your plan proved to be unsuccessful.
Summary (one to two slides): Reiterate the main points of the presentation and conclude with what you are hoping to accomplish as a result of implementing the chosen intervention.
References (last slide): List the references for sources that were cited in the presentation.
Speaker notes: Share in detail how you would verbalize the content on each of the slides to the patient.
Remember, you are creating a patient teaching plan so be sure to include terms easily understood by the general population and limit your use of medical jargon. Slides should include the most important elements for them to know in short bullet-pointed phrases. You may add additional comments in the notes section to clarify information for your instructor.
NR305 Milestone 2: Patient Teaching Plan Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
Introduction/ Identification
(Based on information gathered from the completion of the Family Genetic History and Milestone 1 assignments, identify one preventable disease that the adult participant is at increased risk for developing and choose one modifiable risk factor that is contributing to their increased risk for developing this disease. Provide rationale why this modifiable risk factor is contributing to this individual’s risk for developing this specific disease. Cite family history, current symptoms, and cultural considerations if present.)
Correctly identifies one preventable disease and corresponding modifiable risk factor. Provides in-depth rationale including family history, current symptoms, and cultural considerations for why the adult participant is at increased risk for developing this disease.
70.0 pts
Correctly identifies one preventable disease and corresponding modifiable risk factor. Provides some rationale for why the adult participant is at increased risk for developing this disease but does not include family history, current symptoms, or cultural considerations.
62.0 pts
Correctly identifies one preventable disease and corresponding modifiable risk factor but provides wrong rationale for why the adult participant is at increased risk for developing this disease.
56.0 pts
Correctly identifies one preventable disease, but does not identify a modifiable risk factor.
27.0 pts
Does not identify one preventable disease.
0.0 pts
70.0 pts
Intervention
(Choose one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the preventable disease identified. Create a teaching plan to present this information to your adult participant. Support the use of this intervention with at least one current scholarly source and information gathered from Healthy People 2020. Relate one or two additional, relevant resources such as handouts or websites as applicable.)
Chooses one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen. Thoroughly supports the use of this intervention with at least one current scholarly source AND information gathered from Healthy People 2020. Additional resources that may be of value to the individual such as handouts or websites are included.
100.0 pts
Chooses one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen. Supports the use of this intervention with current scholarly sources OR information gathered from Healthy People 2020. Additional resources that may be of value to the individual such as handouts or websites are included.
88.0 pts
Chooses one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen. Supports the use of this intervention with current but not scholarly sources. Additional resources that may be of value to the individual such as handouts or websites is included.
80.0 pts
Chooses one evidence-based intervention shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen but does not support the use of this intervention with any sources.
38.0 pts
Fails to choose one evidence-based intervention that is shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the specific disease chosen.
0.0 pts
100.0 pts
Evaluation
(You will not have an opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of your teaching plan. Instead, comment on what criteria you would measure in order to evaluate the effectiveness of your plan. Include additional steps to be considered if the plan would prove to be unsuccessful.)
Criteria listed to thoroughly evaluate effectiveness of health education provided in meeting established short and long-term goals. Includes measures to be implemented if initial plan were shown to be ineffective.
30.0 pts
Criteria listed mostly evaluates effectiveness of health education provided in meeting established short or long-term goals. Includes measures to be implemented if initial plan were shown to be ineffective.
26.0 pts
Criteria listed partially evaluates effectiveness of health education or does not Include measures to be implemented if initial plan were shown to be ineffective.
24.0 pts
Criteria listed but it does not evaluate the effectiveness of health education, and does not include measures to be implemented if initial plan were shown to be ineffective.
11.0 pts
No evaluation criteria listed.
0.0 pts
30.0 pts
Summary
(The summary reiterates the main points of the presentation and concludes with what you are hoping to accomplish as a result of implementing the use of the chosen intervention.)
Summary thoroughly reiterates the main points of the presentation and concludes with an in-depth description of what you are hoping to accomplish by implementing the chosen intervention.
20.0 pts
Summary mostly reiterates the main points of the presentation and concludes with a description of what you are hoping to accomplish by implementing the chosen intervention.
18.0 pts
Summary reiterates a few main points and concludes with a brief description of what you are hoping to accomplish by implementing the chosen intervention.
16.0 pts
Summary is present but fails to capture the main points and lacks a brief description of what is hoped to be accomplished.
8.0 pts
No summary included or fails to reiterate main points of the presentation.
0.0 pts
20.0 pts
Clarity of Presentation
(Total of 10–14 slides (not including title and Reference slides), appropriate graphics that add visual appeal, proper grammar, spelling, and professional terminology to aid in patient understanding, no medical jargon. Detailed speaker notes are required.)
Includes 10–14 slides (not including title and reference slides), uses appropriate graphics for visual appeal, uses proper grammar, spelling, and professional terminology to aid in patient understanding rather than medical jargon. Includes detailed speaker notes, introduction, and summary.
30.0 pts
Includes 10–14 slides (with title and reference slides), uses appropriate graphics for visual appeal, uses proper grammar, spelling, and professional terminology to aid in patient understanding rather than medical jargon. Includes speaker notes, but they are lacking detail. Introduction and summary are included.
26.0 pts
Includes 10–14 slides (with title and reference slides), uses graphics that do not add to the message, uses proper grammar, spelling, and professional terminology rather than medical jargon. Includes speaker notes but they lack detail.
24.0 pts
Includes 10-14 slides (with title and reference slides), lacks graphics or uses ones that are inappropriate or lack visual appeal. No speaker notes included. Introduction or summary is missing.
11.0 pts
Presentation does not meet the required number of slides even when including title and reference slides, contains multiple spelling or grammatical errors or contains excessive amounts of medical jargon not appropriate for patient teaching.
0.0 pts
30.0 pts
Total Points: 250.0
