14 Jul PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief Nov 2019 Page 1 of 7A
PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief Nov 2019 Page 1 of 7ASSESSMENT BRIEF 2Subject Code and Title PROJ6009 Business Process Management and SystemsAssessment Assessment 2: Business Process Improvement Reflection (2 parts) Part A: Presentation: Comments on Best Practice of BPI Casestudy Part B: Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study(Incorporating the feedback from the cohort)Individual/Group Individual and/or Group for both Online and Face-to-Face deliveryWords limits Part A: 8-10 minutes (Group presentation)Part B: 1000 words (Individual reflection report)Learning Outcomes 1. Critically analyse the role of management information systemsin sustaining successful organisations.2. Critically evaluate approaches to business processmanagement and systems, their associated risks andimplementation processes.3. Establish and justify governance processes for businessprocess management change to ensure that all stakeholdersare considered in technology change decisionsSubmission Part A: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 4Part B: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Week 11(First half of Module 6)Weighting 40% (Part A: 20%; Part B: 20%)Total Marks 40 (20 marks for each part)Context:This assessment is to evaluate students’ critical thinking and analytical skills, as well as public speakingand personal reflection. The assessment requests students to deliver a presentation in class or via ateleconference, and provide a commentary on a selected Business Process Improvement (BPI) casestudy. Feedback from the cohort must be collected, analysed and incorporated in the personalreflection report, which is the second part of the assessment.PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief Nov 2019 Page 2 of 7Instructions:In this assessment, the students will begin with reading a selective case study of Business ProcessImprovement practice, which is issued during Module 3 study. This assessment contains TWO parts.To prepare for this assessment:Part A: Presentation: Comments on Best Practice of BPI Case study Review Modules 1, 2, 3 and 4; In a team of 4 people, intensively read the case study and conduct extra research whennecessary; Coordinate with team members to design, prepare and rehearse the presentation;Output: Maximum 10 slides (Excluding references and appendices), 8 -10 mins presentation deliveredin class; Online presentations could be delivered via teleconference (Zoom or Skype); Upload on theYoutube as an unlisted video is an option with lecturer’s consultation and permission; Critical analysis and evaluation on the BPI practice of the case study; All team members should be presenting and sharing the workload equally; Actively listen and provide feedback on other teams’ presentation. Marks criteria and feedback form will be used to assess the presentation.Part B: Business Process Improvement Report Review All modules; Familiarise with reflection report writing style.In continuum of Part A, students are required to compile a personal reflection report. The report shouldincorporate the feedback from cohort on Part A presentation, and personal learning journey through thissubject.Output:The BPI Reflection report should cover: Brief description of the case study and comments from Part A; Review and Analysis on the feedback from the cohort; Individual learning journey through the subject. Can follow Before, During, After or What, SoWhat, Now What format; Other personal thinking and feeling.PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief Nov 2019 Page 3 of 7Learning Rubrics Assessment 1 Part A: Business Process Improvement PresentationAssessmentAttributesFail(0-49)Pass(50-64)Credit(65-74)Distinction(75-84)High Distinction(85-100)PresentationContents andStructure50%Limited amount ofinformation obtainedfrom the case study;No data used tosupport thecommentary;No analysis,justification orevaluationpresented;No logical connectionof BPM and BPIknowledge and toolsin the presentation;Poor presentationstructure ororganisationReasonable amount ofinformation obtainedfrom the case study;Some data used tosupport the commentary;Limited analysis andevaluation presented;Limited connection ofBPM and BPI knowledgeand tools in thepresentation;Acceptable organisationof the contents andstructure.Good amount of informationobtained from the casestudy;Reasonable data used tosupport the commentary;Good analysis andevaluation presented;Good connection of BPMand BPI knowledge andtools in the presentation;Well structured contents,easy to follow;Good opening, topics andopinions stated with aconclusive ending;Accurate information obtained fromthe case study;Specific and appropriate data andevidence used to support thecommentary;Comprehensive analysis, critique,justification and evaluationpresentedStrong connection and utilisation ofBPM and BPI knowledge and toolsin the presentation;Clearly structured contents, usingagenda, heading, easy to follow;Strong opening, clear topics andopinions stated with a conclusiveending;Extra research conducted anddemonstrated through validsources.Solid and accurate informationobtained from the case study;Specific and appropriate data andevidence used to support thecommentary;Comprehensive and in-depth analysis,critique and justification presented withnone-bias evaluation;Strong connection and utilisation ofBPM and BPI knowledge and tools inthe presentation;Clearly structured contents, usingagenda, heading, sub-headings, easyto follow;Strong opening, clear topics andopinions stated with a conclusiveending;Extra research conducted anddemonstrated through valid sources.PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief Nov 2019 Page 4 of 7Presentationdelivery andQ&A30%Presentation wasincomplete and noconnection withaudiences;Contents arepatricianly delivered,key parts are missed;Limited languageused, verbalcommunication lackof coherent;NO visual aids use;NO answers toquestions.Presentation wascompleted and someconnection withaudiences;Contents are patricianlydelivered, some missingparts;Use simple andstraightforwardlanguage;Basic visual aids use,not fully support thepresentation;Limited answers toquestions, with incorrectinformation.Smooth presentation andsome connection withaudiences;Contents are delivered in alogical and sensible manner;Use understandable andstraightforward language;Use visual aids to supportdelivery;Partially answeredquestions nicely, providereasonable explanationPresenters demonstrated goodconfidence and connection withaudiences, including bodylanguages and eye contact;Contents are delivered in a logicalcohesive, and sensible manner;Use engaging, professional andstraightforward language;Use various types of visual aids tosupport delivery, incorporating withavailable technologies.Handled questions nicely, providesimple and good explanation.Presenters demonstrated a great dealof confidence and strong connectionwith audiences, including bodylanguages and eye contact;Contents are delivered in a logicalcohesive, and sensible manner; Useengaging, professional andstraightforward language, wellexplained on technical terminologies;Appropriately use various types ofvisual aids to support delivery,incorporating with availabletechnologies.Handle questions with confidence,provide simple and proper answerswith justificationConstructivefeedback topeers20%No useful feedbackprovidedLimited support andencouragementdemonstrated;Lack of awareness ofand sensitivity todiversity amongstpeersOffers some feedback,not specific orconstructive;No articulation betweencontents and BPI;random commentsBasic support andencouragementdemonstrated;Lack of awareness ofand sensitivity todiversity amongst peersOffers some constructivefeedback, specific andappropriate;Reasonable articulationbetween contents and BPI;Feedback communicated topeers with support andencouraging mannerDemonstrates someawareness of and sensitivityto diversity amongst peersOffers detailed constructivefeedback, specific and appropriate;Articulated the presentationcontents and BPI, effectivelycommunicates them to peers;Provides good assistance, support,and encouragement to peers;Demonstrates a good level ofawareness of and sensitivity todiversity amongst peers.Actively offers detailed constructivefeedback, specific and appropriate;Expertly articulated the presentationcontents and BPI, effectivelycommunicates them to peers.Provides excellent assistance, support,and encouragement to peers.Consistently demonstrates a high levelof awareness of and sensitivity todiversity amongst peers.PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief Nov 2019 Page 5 of 7Learning Rubrics Assessment 1 Part B: Business Process Improvement Reflection ReportAssessmentAttributesFail(0-49)Pass(50-64)Credit(65-74)Distinction(75-84)High Distinction(85-100)Description of casestudy and keyelements ofcommentary.20%NO description ofthe case study;Limited informationprovided from thecommentary on BPIpractice;NO evidencepresented.Brief description of thecase study, coveredsome key elements;Some informationprovided from thecommentary on BPIpractice;Limited evidencepresented.Good description of the casestudy, covered some keyelements;Highlight the outcomes ofBPI on organisation;Reasonable amount ofinformation provided from thecommentary on BPI practice;Limited theoretical and/orpractical evidence presentedWell crafted description of the casestudy, covered all elements in briefand professional language.Highlight the outcomes and theimpacts of BPI on organisation;Logical and key information providedfrom the commentary on BPI practice;Some theoretical and/or practicalevidence presented as justification tosupport the evaluation;Excellent and concise description ofthe case study, covered all elementsin brief and professional language.Discuss the outcomes and theimpacts of BPI on organisation fromboth positive and negative aspects;Logical and core information providedfrom the commentary on BPI practice;Relevant theoretical and/or practicalevidence presented as justification tosupport the evaluation;Review andAnalysis on thefeedback from thecohort20%Mentionedconstructivefeedback from thecohort,NO review oranalysisNO discussion onhow the feedbackwill benefit futureperformance.Highlighted constructivefeedback from thecohort,Review the contentsroughly;Mentioned feedbackinto reflection report,limited discussion onhow the feedback willbenefit futureperformance.List a few constructivefeedback from the cohort,Review the contents,categorised them accordingto BPI commentary andpresentation;Mentioned feedback intoreflection report, somediscussion on how thefeedback will benefit futureperformance.List some constructive feedback fromthe cohort, including critiquesReview and analysis the contents,categorised them according to BPIcommentary and presentation;Incorporated feedback into reflectionreport, discussion on how thefeedback will benefit futureperformance.List all constructive feedback from thecohort, including critiquesReview and thorough analysis thecontents, clearly categorised themaccording to BPI commentary andpresentation;Incorporated feedback into reflectionreport, detailed discussion on how thefeedback will benefit futureperformance.PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief Nov 2019 Page 6 of 7Personal learningReflection: Keyknowledge andskills learned fromthis subject.Lesson learnt andbenefits for futurestudy and career.50%Limitedunderstanding ofIntegrated projectmanagement, plan,processes, life cycleand/or enterpriseenvironmentfactors.No personalreflectionKnowledge orunderstanding ofIntegrated projectmanagement, plan,processes, life cycleand/or enterpriseenvironment factors.Often conflates/confuses assertion ofpersonal opinion withinformationsubstantiated byevidence from theresearch/coursematerials.Some attempt at selfcriticism, but fails todemonstrate awarenessof personal biases,stereotypes orpreconceptions.No attempt at askingprobing questions aboutself.Thorough knowledge orunderstanding of Integratedproject management, plan,processes, life cycle and/orenterprise environmentfactors.Supports personal opinionand informationsubstantiated by evidencefrom the research/coursematerials.Realise and reflect topersonal study and careerbenefits from the learning.Some attempt at selfcriticism, but fails todemonstrate awareness ofpersonal biases, stereotypesor preconceptions.Asks some probingquestions about self, but donot attempt to answer these.Highly developed understanding ofIntegrated project management, plan,processes, life cycle and/or enterpriseenvironment factors.Discriminates between assertion ofpersonal opinion and informationsubstantiated by robust evidencefrom the research/course materialsand extended reading.Well demonstrated capacity to explainand apply tools or techniques forfuture study and careerDemonstrates the ability to questionown biases, stereotypes,preconceptions but new modes ofthinking is not evident.Risks asking probing questions aboutself but only attempts to answer thesesometimes.A sophisticated understanding ofIntegrated project management, plan,processes, life cycle and/or enterpriseenvironment factors.Systematically and criticallydiscriminates between assertion ofpersonal opinion and informationsubstantiated by robust evidencefrom the research/course materialsand extended reading.Expertly articulates, justifies andapply tools or techniques for futurestudy and career. Well structuredreport follow reflection frameworksDemonstrates the ability to questionown biases, stereotypes,preconceptions and define newmodes of thinking as a result.Risks asking probing questions aboutself and attempts to answer these.Use of academicand disciplineconventions andsources of evidence10%Poorly written witherrors in spelling,grammar.Demonstratesinconsistent use ofgood quality,credible andIs written according toacademic genre (e.g.with introduction,conclusion or summary)and has accuratespelling, grammar,sentence andparagraph construction.Is well-written and adheres tothe academic genre (e.g.with introduction, conclusionor summary).Demonstrates consistent useof high quality, credible andrelevant research sources toIs very well-written and adheres to theacademic genre.Consistently demonstrates expert useof good quality, credible and relevantresearch sources to support anddevelop appropriate arguments andstatements. Shows evidence ofExpertly written and adheres to theacademic genre.Demonstrates expert use of highquality, credible and relevantresearch sources to support anddevelop arguments and positionstatements. Shows extensivePROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief Nov 2019 Page 7 of 7relevant researchsources to supportand develop ideas.No justificationprovided on theconnection betweenreferences andassessmentcontents.There are mistakesin using the APAstyle.Demonstratesconsistent use ofcredible and relevantresearch sources tosupport and developideas, but these are notalways explicit or welldeveloped. Somejustification provided onthe connection betweenreferences andassessment contents.There are no mistakesin using the APA style.support and develop ideas.Well justified the linkage andconnection betweenreferences and assessmentcontents.There are no mistakes inusing the APA style.reading beyond the key reading.Excellent justification provided on thelinkage and connection betweenreferences and assessment contents.There are no mistakes in using theAPA style.evidence of reading beyond the keyreading. Expertly justified theconnection and validation betweenreferences and assessment contents.There are no mistakes in using theAPA Style.
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.