Question 1. Business Abroad, Inc., a U.S. firm, obtains a judgment in a U.S. court against Quang Tri, Ltd., a Vietnamese business. Whether the court’s judgment will be enforced by a court in Vietnam depends on the Vietnamese court’s application of a. the act of state doctrine. b. the doctrine of sovereign immunity. c. the principle of comity. d. the World Trade Organization . 2. Canada giving effect to the laws and court decisions of the United States is an application of a. the act of state doctrine. b. the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. c. the principle of comity. d. the Sherman Act. 3. A Japanese court awards a Japanese corporation damages against a U.S. firm. A U.S. court will defer and give effect to this award, as long as it is consistent with the laws and public policy of the United States, under a. the act of state doctrine. b. the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. c. the doctrine of sovereign immunity. d. the principle o 4. International Properties, Inc. (IPI), a U.S. firm, owns property in Hong Kong. When Hong Kong reverts to the sovereignty of China, the government takes IPI’s property without paying for it. A U.S. court will probably not examine the validity of this act committed by China within its own territory, under a. the act of state doctrine. b. the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. c. the doctrine of sovereign immunity. d. the principle of comity. 5. Sudan confiscates the assets of Resources Mining Corporation, a U.S. business. Recovery by Resources Mining from Sudan in a U.S. court may be prevented by a. the act of state doctrine. b. the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. c. the doctrine of sovereign immunity. d. the principle of comity. 6. Egypt hires a British advertising agency to promote tourism from Europe but fails to pay for the agency’s services. If the agency attempts to sue Egypt in a U.S. court, Egypt will likely be exempt from the court’s jurisdiction under a. the act of state doctrine. b. the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. c. the doctrine of sovereign immunity. d. the principle of comity. 7. Algeria seizes the property of Clear Water Drilling Corporation, a privately owned business, for a proper public purpose and pays the owners just compensation. This is a. a confiscation. b. a dumping. c. an expropriation. d. none of the above. 8. International Investments, Inc., a U.S. firm, files a suit against Mexico in a U.S. court. Mexico claims foreign sovereign immunity. Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, this claim is determined by a. the U.S. court in which the suit is brought. b. the U.S. Department of Commerce. c. the U.S. Department of State. d. none of the above. 9. North Korea confiscates the property of foreign investors. Kenya expropriates foreign investors’ property. Generally observed legal principles of international law are violated by a. North Korea’s confiscation only. b. Kenya’s expropriation only. c. North Korea’s confiscation and Kenya’s expropriation. d. none of the above. 10. Bert, a German citizen, gives Franz, also a German, a written offer to contract for Franz’s services. German law, like the law in many nations, requires that, once made, an offer must a. be accepted immediately or it expires. b. be preceded by a “gift” to a government official. c. remain open for acceptance for some minimum period of time. d. none of the above. 11. Dieter and Eva, who are citizens of Germany, a civil law country, enter into a contract for the sale of a computer. For a contract to be legally binding, the law in Germany, as in most civil law countries, does not require a. an acceptance. b. an offer. c. consideration. d. all of the above. 12. Miguel enters into a contract to buy tomatoes in Mexico from Rancho Comida and a contract to sell them in the United States to Wholesale Commodities, Inc. For contracts for sales of goods, strict requirements in respect to definiteness of contract terms have been liberalized in a. Mexico. b. the United States. c. both a and b. d. none of the above. 13. Over the phone, Larry enters into contracts with Mustafa in Saudi Arabia and Nora in the United States. To be enforceable, certain types of contracts must be in writing in a. Saudi Arabia. b. the United States. c. both a and b. d. none of the above. 14. Louis works for Electronique Francais, S.A., in France. French law prohibits employers from firing workers unless a. the employer can show mediators that the cause of the dismissal is serious. b. the employer has taken a personal dislike to the workers. c. the workers can show mediators that the cause of the dismissal is not serious. d. none of the above.

1. Business Abroad, Inc., a U.S. firm, obtains a judgment in a U.S. court against Quang Tri, Ltd., a Vietnamese business. Whether the court’s judgment will be enforced by a court in Vietnam depends on the Vietnamese court’s application of

a. the act of state doctrine.
b. the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
c. the principle of comity.
d. the World Trade Organization .

2. Canada giving effect to the laws and court decisions of the United States is an application of

a. the act of state doctrine.
b. the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
c. the principle of comity.
d. the Sherman Act.

3. A Japanese court awards a Japanese corporation damages against a U.S. firm. A U.S. court will defer and give effect to this award, as long as it is consistent with the laws and public policy of the United States, under

a. the act of state doctrine.
b. the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.
c. the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
d. the principle o

4. International Properties, Inc. (IPI), a U.S. firm, owns property in Hong Kong. When Hong Kong reverts to the sovereignty of China, the government takes IPI’s property without paying for it. A U.S. court will probably not examine the validity of this act committed by China within its own territory, under

a. the act of state doctrine.
b. the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.
c. the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
d. the principle of comity.

5. Sudan confiscates the assets of Resources Mining Corporation, a U.S. business. Recovery by Resources Mining from Sudan in a U.S. court may be prevented by

a. the act of state doctrine.
b. the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.
c. the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
d. the principle of comity.

6. Egypt hires a British advertising agency to promote tourism from Europe but fails to pay for the agency’s services. If the agency attempts to sue Egypt in a U.S. court, Egypt will likely be exempt from the court’s jurisdiction under

a. the act of state doctrine.
b. the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.
c. the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
d. the principle of comity.

7. Algeria seizes the property of Clear Water Drilling Corporation, a privately owned business, for a proper public purpose and pays the owners just compensation. This is

a. a confiscation.
b. a dumping.
c. an expropriation.
d. none of the above.

8. International Investments, Inc., a U.S. firm, files a suit against Mexico in a U.S. court. Mexico claims foreign sovereign immunity. Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, this claim is determined by

a. the U.S. court in which the suit is brought.
b. the U.S. Department of Commerce.
c. the U.S. Department of State.
d. none of the above.

9. North Korea confiscates the property of foreign investors. Kenya expropriates foreign investors’ property. Generally observed legal principles of international law are violated by

a. North Korea’s confiscation only.
b. Kenya’s expropriation only.
c. North Korea’s confiscation and Kenya’s expropriation.
d. none of the above.

10. Bert, a German citizen, gives Franz, also a German, a written offer to contract for Franz’s services. German law, like the law in many nations, requires that, once made, an offer must

a. be accepted immediately or it expires.
b. be preceded by a “gift” to a government official.
c. remain open for acceptance for some minimum period of time.
d. none of the above.

11. Dieter and Eva, who are citizens of Germany, a civil law country, enter into a contract for the sale of a computer. For a contract to be legally binding, the law in Germany, as in most civil law countries, does not require

a. an acceptance.
b. an offer.
c. consideration.
d. all of the above.

12. Miguel enters into a contract to buy tomatoes in Mexico from Rancho Comida and a contract to sell them in the United States to Wholesale Commodities, Inc. For contracts for sales of goods, strict requirements in respect to definiteness of contract terms have been liberalized in

a. Mexico.
b. the United States.
c. both a and b.
d. none of the above.

13. Over the phone, Larry enters into contracts with Mustafa in Saudi Arabia and Nora in the United States. To be enforceable, certain types of contracts must be in writing in

a. Saudi Arabia.
b. the United States.
c. both a and b.
d. none of the above.

14. Louis works for Electronique Francais, S.A., in France. French law prohibits employers from firing workers unless

a. the employer can show mediators that the cause of the dismissal is serious.
b. the employer has taken a personal dislike to the workers.
c. the workers can show mediators that the cause of the dismissal is not serious.
d. none of the above.

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.