01 May Referencing guidelines
Assessment details
Tasks
You are required to work on a supplied project and answer some specific questions, and submit the project appraisal report. You should discuss each question logically by using multiple references from academic journals and books. The purpose of project management is to achieve a successful project. Some of the answers are matters of opinion and you will need to study literature for ways to approach them. To support your answer, you can take help from project management books, PMBOK, peer reviewed journal articles and authenticated sources. Report Format
The report needs to consist of the following outlines:
1. Executive summary (brief): Outline clearly the objective of the project, justification to start the Blue Spider project, findings/lesson learned and recommendations.
2. Introduction (brief): Clearly demonstrate project brief, the purpose of the report, key terms/issues that you are going to discuss and the report structure.
3. Project Appraisal/Body: You are required to cover the following questions considering the case study:
Case Study: Blue Spider project – relevant file attached (E-reserve)
1. “The truth doesn’t always win proposals”. Was it a write approach? Discuss the ethical issues in different phases of the project.
2. How did the project team handle risks at different phases of project life cycle? Discuss.
3. Who are the key stakeholders in the project? Briefly discuss the communication management issues with the major stakeholders.
4. Was the selection of project manager right for the project? Was he qualified to be a project manager- rationale your answer?
5. What happens when a situation of mistrust occurs between the customer and the contractor? Discuss the issue with respect to the project.
6. Justify the choice of Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for the project. What other type of contract they could have chosen, and why?
7. Complete your evaluation of project management for this project, and calculate the average rating using the following grid and justify your score.
| Initiation stage | Planning stage | Implementation stage | Closeout phase | Average | |
| Scope management | |||||
| Time management | |||||
| Resource management | |||||
| Communication management | |||||
| Stakeholder management | |||||
| Risk management | |||||
| Contract and procurement management |
8. Document the lessons learned from this project and provide your recommendations.
1. Others: All topics are required to be clearly explained and easy to follow. The report needs to consist of page numbers and table of contents. Use the references and citations properly.
Referencing guidelines
You must acknowledge all the courses of information you have used in your Use
assessments. Harvard
Please use RMIT Harvard referencing style for this assignment. Please visit RMIT referencing style for library referencing page for more tools such as EndNote, referencing tutorials and this assessment. referencing guides for printing.
Submission format
§ Step 1- Turnitin submission: Upload the soft copy of your project appraisal report to Turnitin – assignment-3 Turnitin submission.
§ Step 2- Submission for marks/grade: Submit your project appraisal report through assignment-3 submission folder of Canvas (specific to your class).
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Academic integrity is about honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others while developing your own insights, knowledge and ideas.
You should take extreme care that you have:
§ Acknowledged words, data, diagrams, models, frameworks and/or ideas of others you have quoted (i.e. directly copied), summarised, paraphrased, discussed or mentioned in your assessment through the appropriate referencing methods,
§ Provided a reference list of the publication details so your reader can locate the source if necessary. This includes material taken from Internet sites.
If you do not acknowledge the sources of your material, you may be accused of plagiarism because you have passed off the work and ideas of another person without appropriate referencing, as if they were your own.
RMIT University treats plagiarism as a very serious offence constituting misconduct.
Plagiarism covers a variety of inappropriate behaviours, including:
§ Failure to properly document a source
§ Copyright material from the internet or databases
§ Collusion between students
For further information on our policies and procedures, please refer to the University website.
Assessment declaration
When you submit work electronically, you agree to the assessment declaration.
Assessment Criteria
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
| Criterion A, Executive summary (brief): Clearly outlines the objective of the project, justification to start the Blue Spider project, findings/lesson learned and recommendations. |
Excellent- Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
Good- Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. |
Acceptable- Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. |
Poor- Effort considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
Very poor/None- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 | |
| Criterion B, Introduction (brief): It clearly demonstrates project brief, the purpose of the report, key terms/issues you are going to discuss and the report structure. |
Excellent – Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
Good- Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. |
Acceptable- Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. |
Poor- Effort considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
Very poor/None- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 | |
| Criterion C, Project Appraisal/Body – Question 1: “The truth doesn’t always win proposals”. Was it a write approach? Discuss the ethical issues in different phases of the project. |
Excellent – Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
Good- Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. |
Acceptable- Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. |
Poor- Effort considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
None- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 |
| Appraisal/Body – Question 2: How did the project team handle risks at different phases of project life cycle? Discuss. |
Excellent – Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. | Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. | considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
Very poor/ None- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 | |
| Criterion C, Project Appraisal/Body – Question 3: Who are the key stakeholders in the project? Briefly discuss the communication management issues with the major stakeholders. |
Excellent – Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
Good- Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. |
Acceptable- Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. |
Poor- Effort considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
Very poor/ None- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 | |
| Criterion C, Project Appraisal/Body – Question 4: Was the selection of project manager right for the project? Was he qualified to be a project manager- rationale your answer? |
Excellent – Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
Good- Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. |
Acceptable- Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. |
Poor- Effort considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
Very poor/None- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 |
| Appraisal/Body – Question 5: What happens when a situation of mistrust occurs between the customer and the contractor? Discuss the issue with respect to the project. |
Excellent – Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. | Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. | considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
Very poor/None- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 | |
| Criterion C, Project Appraisal/Body – Question 6: Justify the choice of Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for the project. What other type of contract they could have chosen, and why? |
Excellent – Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
Good- Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. |
Acceptable- Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. |
Poor- Effort considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
None or Very Poor – Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 | |
| Criterion C, Project Appraisal/Body – Question 7: Complete your evaluation of project management for this project, and calculate the average rating using the presented grid and justify your score. |
Excellent- Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
Good- Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. |
Acceptable- Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. | Poor- Effort considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
None or Very Poor- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 | |
| Appraisal/Body – Question 8: Document the lessons learned from this project and provide your recommendations. |
Professional- Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. | Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. | considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
Very poor/ None- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 2.5 to >2.0 pts | 2.0 to >1.5 pts | 1.5 to >1.0 pts | 1.0 to >0.5 pts | 0.5 to 0 pts | 2.5 | |
| Criterion D, Others: Overall presentation (all topics are clearly explained, easy to follow/clarity of language, coverage and completeness, page numbers, table of contents), use of references and citation, conciseness. |
Professional- Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved. |
Good- Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements. |
Acceptable- Has potential to reach the next level but still requires more effort to fully satisfy criteria requirements. |
Poor- Effort considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No or limited establishment of criteria requirement. |
Very poor/ None- Criteria not addressed or no submission received. |
|
| 5 to >4 pts | 4 to >3 pts | 3 to >2 pts | 2 to >1 pts | 1 to 0 pts | 5.0 | |
| Total: | 30 pts |
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.