Research Article Critique: Guidelines and Grading Rubric – Week 6 Purpose The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to examine, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article. Student is to select an article from a list located in Course Resources. There is a choice of articles from whichyou must choose ONE to complete this assignment. Course Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes: CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO #7) CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4 and 8) CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs #4 and 8) CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs #7 and 8) Points The assignment is worth a total of 175 points. Due Date You are to submit your paper to the Week 6 Dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6. Requirements Through this assignment, the student will: 1. Critique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,) 2. Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author’s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5). Guidelines to writing the Paper 1. Course Resources lists articles from which you are to selectONE to analyze. 2. Retrieve the full-text version of the article from the library. Read it thoroughly. Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention. Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed. Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 4. Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph. Describe the research in greater detail. Include your observations about this question. Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 5. Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design. a. Discuss the research design of the study. b. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others. c. You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words 6. Describethe sample. a. Briefly describe the sample size used for this study b. Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer. c. Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study. d. Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified. e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 7. Describe the data collection method(s)’ a. Who collected the data? b. What tools were used? c. What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified. d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 8. Describe the limitations of the study. a. Identify the limitations within the study b. Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies c. Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 9. Describe the findings reported in the study. a. Describe the findings reported in the study b. Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study c. Discuss the credibility of the findings d. If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason? e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 10. Summary Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper. Include a statement about the research question and the findings. Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice? End with a concluding statement. 11. Citations and Referencesmust be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Reference Page: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paperas (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page. A url link alone is not an adequate reference. See the APA Guidelines in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references. NR439 Articles List for Week 6 Research Article Critique Katon, W., Russo, J., & Gavin, A. (2014). Predictors of postpartum depression. Journal of Women’s Health (15409996), 23(9), 753-759. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4824. (7p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103890366&site=eds-live&scope=site Murfet, G. O., Allen, P., &Hingston, T. J. (2014). Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following the implementation of an innovative model of nurse practitioner-led care for diabetes in pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(5), 1150-1163.doi:10.1111/jan.12277. (14p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104059264&site=eds-live&scope=site Sand-Jecklin, K., &Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(19/20), 2854-2863. doi:10.1111/jocn.12575. (10p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=24606553&site=eds-live&scope=site Grading Criteria Category Points % Description Research Question 20 11% Describe, analyze, and summarize the research question for this study your own words. Design of Study 20 11% Describe, analyze, and summarize the research design of this study in your own words. Sample/Population of the Study 25 14% Describe, analyze, and summarize the sample in your own words. Data Collection Methods 25 14% Describe, analyze, and summarize the data collection method(s)’ in your own words. Limitations 20 12% Describe, analyze, and summarize the limitations of the study in your own words. Findings 20 12% Describe, analyze, and summarize the findings reported in the study in your own words. Summary of Article (See rubric for categories and breakdown of points.) 25 14% Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper and discuss theprobability of implementation into practice. Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling/ APA Formatting 20 12% No more than 0–3 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. APA formatting is correct with 0–3 errors. Total 175 100% A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria A (100%) Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance B (88%) Exceeds Very good or high level of performance C (80%) Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance NI (38%) Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance F (0%) Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance Research question 20 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the research question in detail 20 points? Generally, describes, and analyzes the research question 18 points? Brieflysummarizes the research question, but omits some aspects of the question. 16 points? Incorrectly describes the research question. 8 points? Does not describe the research question. 0 points? Design of the study 20 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the design of the study in detail. 20 points? Generally, describes, and analyzes the design of the study. 18 points? Briefly summarizes the design of the study, but omits some aspects of the design. 16 points? Incorrectly describes the design of the study. 8 points? Does not describe the design of the study 0 points? Sample/ population of the study 25 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizesthe sample used in the study in detail. 25 points? Generally, describes, and analyzesthe sample used in the study. 22 points? Briefly summarizesthe sample used in the study, but omits some details. 20 points? Incorrectly describes the sample in the study, or omits major details. 10 points? Does not describethe sample used in the study. 0 points? Data collection methods 25 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes all ofthe data collection methods used in the study. 25 points? Generally, describes, and analyzesthe majority of data collection methods used in the study. 22 points? Briefly summarizes and describes parts ofthe data collection method used in the study. 20 points? Incorrectly describesthe data collection method used in the study. 10 points? Does not describethe data collection method used in the study. 0 points? Limitations 20 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizesthe limitations found in the study in detail. 20 points? Generally, describes, and analyzes the limitations found in the study. 18 points? Briefly summarizes the limitations found in the study. 16 points? Incorrectly describes the limitations found in the study. 8 points? Does not describe the limitations found in the study. 0 points? Findings 20 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the findings of the study in detail. 20 points? Generally, describes, and analyzes the findings of the study. 18 points? Briefly summarizes the findings of the study. 16 points? Incorrectly identifies the findings from the study. 8 points? Does not describe the findings of the study. 0 points? Summary 25 points Summarizes study in detail and states specific rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted 25 points? Generally, summarizes study. Gives broad rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 22 points? Briefly summarizes study and states rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted. 20 points? Minimally summarizes study. Gives poor rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 10 points? Does not summarize study and does not give rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 0 points? Grammar, punctuation, and spelling/ APA formatting 20 points No errors in grammar, punctuation, APA, and spelling. 20 points? One to four errors in grammar, spelling, 18 points? Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax 16 points? Eight to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 8 points? Thirteen or more errors to the point where it is difficult to understand the meaning of the student’s writing. 0 points? Total Points Possible = 175 points

04 Jun Research Article Critique: Guidelines and Grading Rubric – Week 6 Purpose The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to examine, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article. Student is to select an article from a list located in Course Resources. There is a choice of articles from whichyou must choose ONE to complete this assignment. Course Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes: CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO #7) CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4 and 8) CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs #4 and 8) CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs #7 and 8) Points The assignment is worth a total of 175 points. Due Date You are to submit your paper to the Week 6 Dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6. Requirements Through this assignment, the student will: 1. Critique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,) 2. Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author’s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5). Guidelines to writing the Paper 1. Course Resources lists articles from which you are to selectONE to analyze. 2. Retrieve the full-text version of the article from the library. Read it thoroughly. Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention. Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed. Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 4. Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph. Describe the research in greater detail. Include your observations about this question. Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 5. Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design. a. Discuss the research design of the study. b. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others. c. You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words 6. Describethe sample. a. Briefly describe the sample size used for this study b. Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer. c. Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study. d. Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified. e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 7. Describe the data collection method(s)’ a. Who collected the data? b. What tools were used? c. What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified. d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 8. Describe the limitations of the study. a. Identify the limitations within the study b. Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies c. Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 9. Describe the findings reported in the study. a. Describe the findings reported in the study b. Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study c. Discuss the credibility of the findings d. If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason? e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words 10. Summary Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper. Include a statement about the research question and the findings. Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice? End with a concluding statement. 11. Citations and Referencesmust be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Reference Page: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paperas (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page. A url link alone is not an adequate reference. See the APA Guidelines in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references. NR439 Articles List for Week 6 Research Article Critique Katon, W., Russo, J., & Gavin, A. (2014). Predictors of postpartum depression. Journal of Women’s Health (15409996), 23(9), 753-759. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4824. (7p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103890366&site=eds-live&scope=site Murfet, G. O., Allen, P., &Hingston, T. J. (2014). Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following the implementation of an innovative model of nurse practitioner-led care for diabetes in pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(5), 1150-1163.doi:10.1111/jan.12277. (14p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104059264&site=eds-live&scope=site Sand-Jecklin, K., &Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(19/20), 2854-2863. doi:10.1111/jocn.12575. (10p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=24606553&site=eds-live&scope=site Grading Criteria Category Points % Description Research Question 20 11% Describe, analyze, and summarize the research question for this study your own words. Design of Study 20 11% Describe, analyze, and summarize the research design of this study in your own words. Sample/Population of the Study 25 14% Describe, analyze, and summarize the sample in your own words. Data Collection Methods 25 14% Describe, analyze, and summarize the data collection method(s)’ in your own words. Limitations 20 12% Describe, analyze, and summarize the limitations of the study in your own words. Findings 20 12% Describe, analyze, and summarize the findings reported in the study in your own words. Summary of Article (See rubric for categories and breakdown of points.) 25 14% Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper and discuss theprobability of implementation into practice. Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling/ APA Formatting 20 12% No more than 0–3 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. APA formatting is correct with 0–3 errors. Total 175 100% A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria A (100%) Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance B (88%) Exceeds Very good or high level of performance C (80%) Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance NI (38%) Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance F (0%) Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance Research question 20 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the research question in detail 20 points? Generally, describes, and analyzes the research question 18 points? Brieflysummarizes the research question, but omits some aspects of the question. 16 points? Incorrectly describes the research question. 8 points? Does not describe the research question. 0 points? Design of the study 20 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the design of the study in detail. 20 points? Generally, describes, and analyzes the design of the study. 18 points? Briefly summarizes the design of the study, but omits some aspects of the design. 16 points? Incorrectly describes the design of the study. 8 points? Does not describe the design of the study 0 points? Sample/ population of the study 25 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizesthe sample used in the study in detail. 25 points? Generally, describes, and analyzesthe sample used in the study. 22 points? Briefly summarizesthe sample used in the study, but omits some details. 20 points? Incorrectly describes the sample in the study, or omits major details. 10 points? Does not describethe sample used in the study. 0 points? Data collection methods 25 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes all ofthe data collection methods used in the study. 25 points? Generally, describes, and analyzesthe majority of data collection methods used in the study. 22 points? Briefly summarizes and describes parts ofthe data collection method used in the study. 20 points? Incorrectly describesthe data collection method used in the study. 10 points? Does not describethe data collection method used in the study. 0 points? Limitations 20 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizesthe limitations found in the study in detail. 20 points? Generally, describes, and analyzes the limitations found in the study. 18 points? Briefly summarizes the limitations found in the study. 16 points? Incorrectly describes the limitations found in the study. 8 points? Does not describe the limitations found in the study. 0 points? Findings 20 points Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the findings of the study in detail. 20 points? Generally, describes, and analyzes the findings of the study. 18 points? Briefly summarizes the findings of the study. 16 points? Incorrectly identifies the findings from the study. 8 points? Does not describe the findings of the study. 0 points? Summary 25 points Summarizes study in detail and states specific rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted 25 points? Generally, summarizes study. Gives broad rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 22 points? Briefly summarizes study and states rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted. 20 points? Minimally summarizes study. Gives poor rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 10 points? Does not summarize study and does not give rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 0 points? Grammar, punctuation, and spelling/ APA formatting 20 points No errors in grammar, punctuation, APA, and spelling. 20 points? One to four errors in grammar, spelling, 18 points? Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax 16 points? Eight to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 8 points? Thirteen or more errors to the point where it is difficult to understand the meaning of the student’s writing. 0 points? Total Points Possible = 175 points

Research Article Critique:

Guidelines and Grading Rubric – Week 6

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to examine, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article. Student is to select an article from a list located in Course Resources. There is a choice of articles from whichyou must choose ONE to complete this assignment.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO #7)

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4 and 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs #4 and 8)

CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs #7 and 8)

Points

The assignment is worth a total of 175 points.

Due Date

You are to submit your paper to the Week 6 Dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.

Requirements

Through this assignment, the student will:

1. Critique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,)

2. Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author’s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5).

Guidelines to writing the Paper

1. Course Resources lists articles from which you are to selectONE to analyze.

2. Retrieve the full-text version of the article from the library. Read it thoroughly.

1. Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention.
   1. Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed.
   2. Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice.
   3. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

4. Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph.

1. 1. Describe the research in greater detail.
   2. Include your observations about this question.
   3. Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question.
   4. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

5. Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.

a. Discuss the research design of the study.

b. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.

c. You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words

6. Describethe sample.

a. Briefly describe the sample size used for this study

b. Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.

c. Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.

d. Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.

e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

7. Describe the data collection method(s)’

a. Who collected the data?

b. What tools were used?

c. What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified.

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

8. Describe the limitations of the study.

a. Identify the limitations within the study

b. Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies

c. Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

9. Describe the findings reported in the study.

a. Describe the findings reported in the study

b. Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study

c. Discuss the credibility of the findings

d. If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?

e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

10. Summary

1. 1. Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper.
   2. Include a statement about the research question and the findings.
   3. Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice?
   4. End with a concluding statement.

11. Citations and Referencesmust be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source.

1. Reference Page: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paperas (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page. A url link alone is not an adequate reference. See the APA Guidelines in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references.

NR439 Articles List for Week 6 Research Article Critique

Katon, W., Russo, J., & Gavin, A. (2014). Predictors of postpartum depression. Journal of Women’s Health (15409996), 23(9), 753-759. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4824. (7p.)

Persistent link to this record (Permalink):

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103890366&site=eds-live&scope=site

Murfet, G. O., Allen, P., &Hingston, T. J. (2014). Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following the implementation of an innovative model of nurse practitioner-led care for diabetes in pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(5), 1150-1163.doi:10.1111/jan.12277. (14p.)

Persistent link to this record (Permalink):

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104059264&site=eds-live&scope=site

Sand-Jecklin, K., &Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(19/20), 2854-2863. doi:10.1111/jocn.12575. (10p.)

Persistent link to this record (Permalink):

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=24606553&site=eds-live&scope=site

Grading Criteria

Category	Points	%	Description
Research Question	20	11%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the research question for this study your own words.
Design of Study	20	11%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the research design of this study in your own words.
Sample/Population of the Study	25	14%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the sample in your own words.
Data Collection Methods	25	14%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the data collection method(s)’ in your own words.
Limitations	20	12%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the limitations of the study in your own words.
Findings	20	12%	Describe, analyze, and summarize the findings reported in the study in your own words.
Summary of Article (See rubric for categories and breakdown of points.)	25	14%	Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper and discuss theprobability of implementation into practice.
Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling/ APA Formatting	20	12%	No more than 0–3 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. APA formatting is correct with 0–3 errors.
Total	175	100%	A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

 

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria	A (100%) Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance	B (88%) Exceeds Very good or high level of performance	C (80%) Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance	NI (38%) Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance	F (0%) Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance
Research question 20 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the research question in detail 20 points?	Generally, describes, and analyzes the research question 18 points?	Brieflysummarizes the research question, but omits some aspects of the question. 16 points?	Incorrectly describes the research question. 8 points?	Does not describe the research question. 0 points?
Design of the study 20 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the design of the study in detail. 20 points?	Generally, describes, and analyzes the design of the study. 18 points?	Briefly summarizes the design of the study, but omits some aspects of the design. 16 points?	Incorrectly describes the design of the study. 8 points?	Does not describe the design of the study 0 points?
Sample/ population of the study 25 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizesthe sample used in the study in detail. 25 points?	Generally, describes, and analyzesthe sample used in the study. 22 points?	Briefly summarizesthe sample used in the study, but omits some details. 20 points?	Incorrectly describes the sample in the study, or omits major details. 10 points?	Does not describethe sample used in the study. 0 points?
Data collection methods 25 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes all ofthe data collection methods used in the study. 25 points?	Generally, describes, and analyzesthe majority of data collection methods used in the study. 22 points?	Briefly summarizes and describes parts ofthe data collection method used in the study. 20 points?	Incorrectly describesthe data collection method used in the study. 10 points?	Does not describethe data collection method used in the study. 0 points?
Limitations 20 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizesthe limitations found in the study in detail. 20 points?	Generally, describes, and analyzes the limitations found in the study. 18 points?	Briefly summarizes the limitations found in the study. 16 points?	Incorrectly describes the limitations found in the study. 8 points?	Does not describe the limitations found in the study. 0 points?
Findings 20 points	Fully describes, analyzes, and summarizes the findings of the study in detail. 20 points?	Generally, describes, and analyzes the findings of the study. 18 points?	Briefly summarizes the findings of the study. 16 points?	Incorrectly identifies the findings from the study. 8 points?	Does not describe the findings of the study. 0 points?
Summary 25 points	Summarizes study in detail and states specific rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted 25 points?	Generally, summarizes study. Gives broad rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 22 points?	Briefly summarizes study and states rationale for whether a change in practice is warranted. 20 points?	Minimally summarizes study. Gives poor rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 10 points?	Does not summarize study and does not give rationale forwhether a change in practice is warranted. 0 points?
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling/ APA formatting 20 points	No errors in grammar, punctuation, APA, and spelling. 20 points?	One to four errors in grammar, spelling, 18 points?	Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax 16 points?	Eight to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 8 points?	Thirteen or more errors to the point where it is difficult to understand the meaning of the student’s writing. 0 points?
Total Points Possible = 175 points