17 Jul See
Posted at 02:38h
in 1Academic Level
Assessment item 1
Understanding the Problem
Value: 10%
Submission method options
Alternative submission method
Task
Background:
The Commonwealth Government of Australia is launching ‘My Health Record’ a secure online summary of an individual’s health information.
Available to all Australians, My Health Record is an electronic summary of an individual’s key health information, drawn from their existing records and is designed to be integrated into existing local clinical systems.
The ‘My Health Record’ is driven by the need for the Health Industry to continue a process of reform to drive efficiencies into the health care system, improve the quality of patient care, whilst reducing several issues that were apparent from the lack of important information that is shared about patients e.g. reducing the rate of hospital admissions due to issues with prescribed medications. This reform is critical to address the escalating costs of healthcare that become unsustainable in the medium to long term.
Individuals will control what goes into their My Health Record, and who is allowed to access it. An individual’s My Health Record allows them and their doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers to view and share the individual’s health information to provide the best possible care.
*Please Note: This is a real project that has already been implemented, however, for this assessment you are to write your answer as if the project is in its’ the early stages. There is wide variety of information that can be referenced on this topic.
Complete the Following
You are a Systems Analyst that is part of a project that is being currently being proposed, ‘My Health Record’, your task is to develop a Vision Document for this project.
Currently funding is being sought to build the ‘My Health Record’ system. We will assume that the funding has been approved and that you are the business systems analyst assigned to the project.
You are to describe the problem in your own words, and the capabilities and benefits. You need to create a Project Vision Document which contains:
- Problem
- Capabilities
- Benefits
Specific analysis techniques have not been taught yet, so this assignment does not require technical descriptions.
Online submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your subject lecturer in the class or by notification in the subject site.
Rationale
This assignment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:
- the context of an information system;
- the processes in systems analysis;
- the approaches in systems analysis
Marking criteria
|
Level Attained
Criteria
|
STANDARDS
|
||||
|
High Distinction
|
Distinction
|
Credit
|
Pass
|
Fail
|
|
|
1. Content of the Vision Document
Maximum
4 Marks
|
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. |
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content.
Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
|
Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. |
Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner.
Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.
|
Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources.
Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
|
|
2. Clarity of expression and presentation of response
Maximum
3 Marks
|
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.
Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised.
|
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.
Grammar and spelling accurate.
|
Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response.
Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.
Grammar and spelling accurate.
|
Some skills in expression and presentation of response.
Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised.
Grammar and spelling contain errors. Significantly exceeded or fell short of the 3 page guide.
|
Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response.
Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner.
Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised,
Grammar and spelling contain errors.
Ignored length requirements completely.
|
|
3. Referencing and Citation
Maximum
3 Marks
|
Referencing is consistently accurate and according to the APA standard. All references are cited in the text. At least 5 references provided. | Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. Most of the references are cited in the text. At least 4 references provided. | Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA standard. Few references are cited in the text. At least 3 references provided. | Attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only few references are cited in the text. At least 2 references provided. | Referencing is absent/unsystematic. |
Presentation
Your answer should be a report approx. 3 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of the page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations.
Requirements
For this assessment you are required to use APA referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu. In addition a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-6
Assessment item 2
Requirements Gathering
Value: 30%
Submission method options
Alternative submission method
Task
Background
Refer to background information provided in Assessment 1 regarding the Commonwealth Government ‘My Health Record’ project.
Complete the Following
Please refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress.
Consider that funding has been approved for a project to build a system that will capture the ‘story’ the first time it is told, and give access to successive professionals, so that case notes and the story can become enriched, and the young person can be assisted more appropriately. You are the business systems analyst assigned to the project, you will need to produce:
Stakeholder map
- Draw stakeholder role names on a stakeholder map with 4 quadrants, Internal-Operation, Internal-Executive, External-Operation, External-Executive
- For each stakeholder, describe why they have an interest in the project.
Questionnaire
Create one questionnaire that you would send to one stakeholder group with an aim to help you identify further details about the environment, the problem area and/or how the system would operate to help solve the problem.
- Identify which stakeholder you are going to send the questionnaire to
- Write an introduction statement that would go with the questionnaire explaining the purpose of the questionnaire
- Write 10 questions, either open and/or closed ended questions
- This should be written as a questionnaire that could be distributed
- Only write the questions, you should not write the answers
Use Case diagram and descriptions
- Draw a use case model for the information system
- Write brief Use Case description for each Use Case in the diagram
- Write one fully developed Use Case description for one of the important Use Cases identified. Select an important Use Case that is key part of the system, not a basic simple Use Case.
Rationale
This assessment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:
- apply stakeholder analysis for of an information system;
- describe and apply requirements gathering techniques;
- define functional requirements
Marking criteria
|
Criteria
|
High Distinction (HD)
|
Distinction (DI)
|
Credit (CR)
|
Pass (PS)
|
Fail (FL)
|
|
1.Stakeholder map
Maximum 5 Marks
|
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Clearly shows Stakeholder map. | Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Clearly shows Stakeholder map. | Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Shows Stakeholders. | Demonstrates understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Lists Stakeholders. | Has not demonstrated understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Stakeholders not listed or inappropriate. |
|
2.Questionnaire
Maximum 5 Marks
|
10 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights to and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core material. | 7 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth of understanding and has insights to aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read the core material. | 5 or more questions are stated that demonstrates understanding. Evidence of having read the core material. | 3 or less questions stated, little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Basic knowledge of key principles and concepts. | 1 or less questions stated, very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. |
|
3.Functional Requirements
Maximum 16 Marks
|
Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. | Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. | Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. | Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. | Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. |
|
4.Presentation, writing style, grammer and references
Maximum 4 Marks
|
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised. |
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. |
Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. |
Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar and spelling contain errors. |
Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised, Grammar and spelling contain errors. |
Presentation
Your answer should be approx. 5 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations.
Requirements
If any references are required, ensure to use APA referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu. In addition a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-6
Assessment item 3
Requirements Report
Value: 30%
Submission method options
Alternative submission method
Task
Further Background
Refer to background information provided in Assessment 1 regarding the Commonwealth Government ‘My Health Record’ project.
The project is considering cloud based solutions which should be investigated. Consider various aspects of cloud based solutions such as; data security, which includes data ownership (by Department of Health, the young person, medical professionals, the Emergency Department etc). As well as other relevant aspects of cloud solutions.
Complete the Following
Please refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress.
Non-Functional Requirements
- This sets out the critical system qualities, system interfaces, user interface requirements, and system constraints.
- Use to ‘FURPS+’ acronym as reference, and ensure you at cover the non-functional aspects of the acronym, Usability, Reliability, Performance and Security.
Review of cloud based.
A review of strengths and weaknesses of cloud based solutions. Taking into consideration the environment which the solution would be deployed.
SDLC Approach
Write brief description of the Pros and Cons to approaching the project using the ‘Predictive’ SDLC, then the Pros and Cons to approach the project as ‘Adaptive’ SDLC. Then recommend either Predictive or Adaptive to the SDLC for the project and briefly describe why.
Rationale
This assignment is intended to develop and test your ability to research information system relevant issues. As well as develop requirement information. Also to consider the appropriate approach depending on criteria of Information System solution.
Marking criteria
|
CRITERIA
|
STANDARDS
|
||||
|
High Distinction
|
Distinction
|
Credit
|
Pass
|
Fail
|
|
|
1.Non-Functional Requirements
Maximum 10 Marks
|
Specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. | Specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. | Specifies the main qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. | Specifies some of the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. |
Poorly specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
|
|
2.Review of cloud based solution
Maximum 8 Marks
|
Clearly identified strengths and weaknesses of cloud solutions. As well as apply indepth understanding of the environment that the solution would be used in. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. | Clearly identified strengths and weaknesses of cloud solutions Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. | Strengths and weaknesses are identified. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. | Strengths and weaknesses are identified. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. | Strengths and weaknesses are poorly expressed. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. |
|
3. SDLC Approach
Maximum 8 marks
|
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. | Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. | Demonstrates clear understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. | Discusses the SDLC approach. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. | Poor discussion of SDLC approach. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. |
|
4.Presentation, writing style, grammer and references
Maximum 4 Marks
|
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organised. |
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organised. |
Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. |
Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar and spelling contain errors. |
Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised, Grammar and spelling contain errors. |
Presentation
Your answer should be approx. 7 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations.
Requirements
If any references are required, ensure to use APA referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu. In addition a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-6
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.