08 Jul The Sony Hack case study: conduct further research to engage with t
The Sony Hack case study: conduct further research to engage with the nuances of the case and to enforce your reasoning. Address the following points in your analysis: Identify the threat Sony faced in the 2014 hack and explain their motives. Explain whether or not you think the aspects of Sony’s sector made it vulnerable to the threat you have identified. Offer an explanation of the methods of attack the threat actor employed to breach its cybersecurity and justify your reasoning. Describe a scenario of what method of attack at least one other type of threat actor could use in the future, and why. Your answer should be between 400 and 500 words.This ongoing project submission will be graded according to the following rubric: Very poorPoorSatisfactoryVery goodExceptional Adherence to brief Student has detailed: – why or why not the organization’s sector makes it vulnerable.- the relevant threats to the organization (between two and three for their own organization, and the correct threat and a potential threat for Sony)- associated methods of cyberattackAnswer falls within the prescribed word count (400-500 words) No submission, or student fails to address any element of the brief. (0)Some key elements are not addressed. Most information provided is irrelevant. ORAnswer does not fall within the prescribed word count (100 words over word count). (5.5)Student has adhered to most of the brief. Sufficient information is provided and is mostly relevant. (7)Student has adhered to almost all elements of the brief. Almost all information is provided and is relevant. (8.5)Student has fully adhered to the brief. All information provided is comprehensive and relevant. (10) Insight into organization’s sectorStudent has justified how (or why not) the threat actors relate to the organization’s sector. No submission, or student fails to demonstrate even basic understanding of how the threat actors relate (or do not relate) to the organization’s sector. (0)Student shows an incomplete understanding of how the threat actors relate (or do not relate) to the organization’s sector. (5.5) Student has adequately explained how (or why not) the threat actors relate to the organization’s sector. However, at least one aspect is either not completely correct or complete.Student has clearly justified how (or why not) the threat actors relate to the organization’s sector. (8.5)Student has comprehensively and insightfully justified how (or why not) the threat actors relate to the organization’s sector. (10) Insight into threat actors Student has demonstrated their understanding by providing substantial justification of the two to three threat actors they have identified.In the case of Sony, student has demonstrated their understanding by providing substantial justification of the threat actor they identified in the 2014 hack, as well as one other potential threat actor.No submission, or student fails to demonstrate even basic understanding of threats to the organization. (0)Student shows an incomplete understanding of threats to the organization. Their justification of threat actors is incomplete, or lacks logic or accuracy. (5.5) Student demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of threats to the organization. Their justification of threat actors is adequate in its logic and accuracy. However, at least one aspect is either not completely correct or complete. (7)Student demonstrates a strong understanding of threats to the organization. Their justification of threat actors is sound in its logic and accuracy. (8.5)Student demonstrates a masterful understanding of threats to the organization. Their justification of threat actors is accurate, convincing, and insightful. (10) Insight into methods of attackStudent has demonstrated their understanding by accurately describing their identified threat actors’ associated methods of cyberattack. In the case of Sony, student has demonstrated their understanding by describing a justification of the threat actor’s methods of attack in the 2014 hack, as well as the methods of one other potential threat actor.No submission, or student fails to demonstrate even basic understanding of methods of attack. (0)Student shows an incomplete understanding of their identified threat actors’ methods of attack. Their justification of their methods of attack is incomplete, or lacks logic or accuracy. (5.5) Student demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of their identified threat actors’ methods of attack. Their justification of their methods of attack is adequate in its logic and accuracy. However, at least one aspect is either not completely correct or complete. (7)Student demonstrates a strong understanding of their identified threat actors’ methods of attack. Their justification of their methods of attack is sound in its logic and accuracy. (8.5)Student demonstrates a masterful understanding of their identified threat actors’ methods of attack. Their justification of threat actors is accurate, convincing, and insightful. (10) Organization of writingAnswer should be structured clearly and logically.No submission, or complete lack of logical structure. (0)Answer has some logical structure, but not enough to justify a passing grade. (5.5)Answer is structured fairly well in terms of logic and clarity. (7)Answer is structured very well in terms of logic and clarity. (8.5)Answer is structured exceptionally well in terms of logic and clarity. (10)Total: 50 points
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Writedemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.